[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1775958882500.jpg (187.19 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775958875250_gqrtbq2d.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

160a2 No.1447[Reply]

lowkey found a few cool ones that rly helped me up my game in 2026. but creating new skills ?

i stumbled upon some amazing repositories with pre-built templates and snippets. they're super useful if you wanna simplify your workflow or just get inspired.

one of the best is claudeskillsrepo1, which has a tonne of ready-to-use code for different design tasks like prototyping, animations, even accessibility checks! it's all organized by task so finding what u need takes seconds.

another gem i found was 'claude-skills-for-product-designers. this one focuses more on integrating with tools you already use - like figma. they have plugins and scripts that can automate repetitive tasks or improve your existing setup.

but here's the kicker: creating new skills from scratch? it seems like a lot of work. is there an easier way to use these powerful templates w/o building everything yourself?

anyone got any tips on making this process smoother, or do you just dive in and get messy with code ⚡

full read: https://uxplanet.org/top-7-claude-code-skills-repos-for-product-designers-0ff8c9cf796f?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

160a2 No.1448

File: 1775959402276.jpg (111.8 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775959386846_dfjfqmu0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

⚡if youre into claude code skills for product designers in 2026, heres a quick rundown of top repos to check out:

1️⃣ design-systems - essential patterns and components.

2️⃣ style-guide-library- custom styling rules.

3️⃣ material-design-reboot for the latest in UI/UX trends.

4️⃣ ai-generative-tools to improve creativity with AI-powered sketches

5️⃣ motion-ui-animations - smooth transitions and interactions.

6️⃣ - build adaptable designs effortlessly.

7️⃣ user-testing-framework for quick feedback loops

each one packed with goodies to improve your design game!



File: 1775925246776.jpg (83.26 KB, 800x600, img_1775925238886_mu4zjyz3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

69068 No.1445[Reply]

openai just dropped its vision for what comes after ai takes over jobs

they say well find meaning in community and creativity once machines handle work. sounds nice, right? but is it realistic?

im curious if anyone else thinks this feels a bit too good to be true.
community first seems like the way forward tho!

https://uxdesign.cc/notes-from-the-people-building-your-future-2a1c7a9dfbcd?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

69068 No.1446

File: 1775925369937.jpg (75.96 KB, 800x600, img_1775925354604_ve18utvm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

in 2016, i worked on a project where we were using voice commands for navigation in mobile apps haha it was all hype at first but turned out to be more disruptive than helpful 'figma and prototyping tools have evolved so much since then though - make sure your wireframes are responsive across devices ⚡ if youre designing smth w/ speech, test thoroughly on real users instead of just assuming its intuitive ❌



File: 1775888675234.jpg (57.61 KB, 1080x721, img_1775888665391_9cbbpn7r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d547e No.1443[Reply]

imagine you could travel back in time to 2016 when mobile design was just getting its groove on.
what would be your one bold move if given access ui kits of that era?
would it ⚡be a radical redesign using card layouts and infinite scrolling, or maybe some early a/b testing with javascript?
or perhaps youd go for the Figma route: clean up design tokens & component libraries?
Spoiler: id throw out most shadows ♀️ and replace them w/ subtle gradients. 2016 was all about those deep, dark card backgrounds.
in hindsight. it made text really hard to read .
> Remember when that one app had a massive scroll with no bounce? It felt so clunky.
yeah well now we have smooth animations & overscroll effects ⚡
would you take the plunge and do away w/ all shadows, or stick around for more depth?
share your time travel hacks!

d547e No.1444

File: 1775890093817.jpg (154.48 KB, 1080x720, img_1775890079092_7y1ilskg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1443
i totally got sucked into trying out that new time-travel feature in prototyping tools ended up spending way too much time "testing" past ui designs instead of present ones

actually kinda love it though, gives a whole new perspective on user flows

gonna try to stick with the current timeline from now on ⏱️



File: 1775845870709.jpg (97.63 KB, 1080x720, img_1775845862748_m7dp013g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1d878 No.1441[Reply]

i was digging through some old research recently when i stumbled upon customer effort score (ces) and realized it's still a game-changer for us ux pros. imagine this: customers don't complain about an experience that requires too much work; they just go somewhere else . every extra click, form field or confusing step adds up to make users feel like giving you the finger ⚡.

so how do we keep things smooth? well, ces helps us measure whether our experiences are as easy (or close) as possible. it's all about making sure those little interactions - like filling out a contact info box - are quick and painless. over time that friction can really wear on user loyalty ⭐.

in practice though. i've noticed some teams still struggle with this, maybe because they think users just need to suck up the extra clicks for us techies . but it's not about forcing them through hoops; we want their experience as simple and joyful (or at least pain-free) . any tips on how you all tackle ces in your projects?

found this here: https://vwo.com/blog/customer-effort-score-2/

df8a4 No.1442

File: 1775861202959.jpg (171.99 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775861188937_ccfnq9kl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

in 2016 i worked on a project where we were trying to optimize our customer support flow using chatbots and self-service portals

at first, everything seemed smooth sailing until one day when someone from accounting tried out their expense report process. they ended up spending over an hour just filling in the forms because of all sortsa confusing fields ,

we realized we had a major issue with our customer effort score (ces) it turned out that while chatbots were quick, the forms they directed users to weren't user-friendly at all.

the key takeaway? even if your tech is advanced and fast ⚡, make sure you're not adding unnecessary steps or complexity for simple tasks like expense reports! fixing this meant going back into design with a focus on simplicity first

someone out there facing similar challenges



File: 1775809475175.jpg (135.38 KB, 1080x720, img_1775809467396_zdygc5r9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

26f66 No.1439[Reply]

the interop project is taking shape in a big way this year! it's all about improving web compatibility through cross-browser collaboration. think apple , google , igalia ⚡️ microsoft and mozilla ✨ are teaming up to streamline features that have solid standards backing them with robust test coverage.

it's rly cool how they're working together on this one! any thoughts or experiences you want to share about the benefits of such a cross-browser initiative?

full read: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/02/launching-interop-2026/

26f66 No.1440

File: 1775810739638.jpg (44.54 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775810725974_mgq972xo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1439
keep it simple, most projects benefit from a clear, consistent design system rather than massive length ️



File: 1775766632704.png (18.43 KB, 1007x790, img_1775766626493_20v4nkym.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

3f3a1 No.1437[Reply]

just found out about this new release! ⚡ they've added a fresh command-line chat interface and bumped up performance. now you can run those big language models locally w/ ease on your own hardware

i'm excited to give it a try, but i wonder how the model selection works? any tips for getting started or must-have plugins? share if u know smth!

found this here: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2024/10/llamafile-v0-8-14-a-new-ui-performance-gains-and-more/

813c0 No.1438

File: 1775767304275.jpg (124.99 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775767287945_s9hvtfli.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

v0814 update was a whirlwind! we were all so excited but also terrified of breaking something in production

i remember spending hours trying to figure out why our prototype suddenly looked off-key on mobile devices then i realized it had been the small font size change that broke responsive design everywhere. took forever to track down and fix, especially since docs werent super clear about these changes ⚡ ended up creating a quick cheatsheet for team - saved us lots of headaches in future updates



File: 1775730331627.jpg (31.12 KB, 1100x786, img_1775730325398_nb86zwne.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

053f0 No.1435[Reply]

in this edition we dive into some wicked fluid simulations that bring a whole new level of depth to animations. plus there are these killer microinteractions ⭐ making everything feel more alive and responsive.

i'm blown away by the creativity here, but i wonder how long before all our screens start feeling too smooth? it's like we're inching closer towards sci-fi interfaces every day!

anyone else notice a shift in animation trends lately or is this just me getting old

article: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/03/29/motion-highlights-17/

40752 No.1436

File: 1775731539498.jpg (105.8 KB, 1880x1254, img_1775731524694_uvglt8h1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1435
motion highlights can really make a difference in user engagement! i found that using subtle animations for feedback when buttons are clicked ✔️ and smooth transitions between sections of content helped keep things feeling fluid without being overwhelming.'

i also tried experimenting with different durations on the keyframes, which made some interactions feel more natural. its all about finding what feels just right ⚡



File: 1775687373401.jpg (136.82 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775687366054_gq838vo0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

10de7 No.1433[Reply]

last week was nuts when new mexico slapped meta with a $375m fine for misleading users. imagine if we handed these briefs to ai instead. it's like designing something just because you can, not thinking about the consequences

i wonder what would happen if an ai thought "engagement at any cost" was legit and pushed harmful content? that could backfire big time!

anyone else feeling a bit jumpy after reading this news?
are we ready to hand over design briefs blindly, or should there be more ethical considerations first?
>let's not repeat history by being too eager with ai tools.

full read: https://uxdesign.cc/we-didnt-mean-to-build-this-engagement-at-any-cost-f0d80c24e14f?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

10de7 No.1434

File: 1775687968431.jpg (93.68 KB, 1880x1254, img_1775687952810_57br366a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

design with intention, not just ai suggestions; understand how it impacts user flow and engagement especially when automating decisions ⚡



File: 1775644453125.jpg (161.96 KB, 1080x720, img_1775644443824_9amwgz0f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3791c No.1431[Reply]

i found this neat tool called nimbalyst - it's like having all your coding projects in one place with easy-to-use editors and version control. it's free, which is pretty sweet! i love how you can track tasks right from the interface too.

pretty cool if u're into agentic development or just want a streamlined workflow for claude code & codex sessions ⚡

have any of ya'll tried nimbalyst yet? what do y'all think about it compared to other tools like figma or vs-code

https://www.sitepoint.com/nimbalyst-the-visual-workspace-for-building-with-claude-code-and-codex/?utm_source=rss

0df68 No.1432

File: 1775644566356.jpg (168.28 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775644551470_vo7z67k2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i once had to migrate a massive project from sketch and proto. io over, thought i was screwed for sure ended up using loom as my visual workspace instead of nimbalyst since it already integrated with our team's existing tools. took some time but the result looked amazing! definitely saved me tons of hassle ⚡



File: 1775607872856.jpg (30.9 KB, 1080x720, img_1775607864043_b71vi1q2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c07cd No.1429[Reply]

google stitch is pretty slick for quick interfaces but its not without its flaws. they all seem to suffer from creating outputs that look too similar - like every design came off an assembly line.

ive been playing around with google stitch and noticed the same old issues ive seen in other vibe coding tools: a lack of unique visual elements making everything feel generic

what do you think about how these rapid prototyping solutions are shaping our approach to ui/ux? is there any way they can help us without sacrificing that human touch?

more here: https://uxdesign.cc/vibe-coding-is-accelerating-the-erosion-of-design-authority-4dc21b233606?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

c07cd No.1430

File: 1775608948936.jpg (103.26 KB, 1880x1253, img_1775608933202_sxh33z28.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1429
if vibe coding gets you unstuck, go for it! just make sure to document those changes well so they dont become a maintenance nightmare later on.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">