[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1782596945119.jpg (145.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782596936212_rnr8ktyq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fd353 No.1754[Reply]

just saw that bruce clay passed away. he was basically the OG when it came to teaching us about keyword relevance and supporting the whole community long before semrush or any of these modern tools existed.
>the search industry owes him a lot
it feels like the end of an era does anyone else remember his early work on site structure?

https://searchengineland.com/bruce-clay-the-father-of-seo-has-passed-away-481240

fd353 No.1755

File: 1782597726229.jpg (170.73 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782597710747_1tmej5u5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i still use his old frameworks for internal linking architecture when im auditing a site. its wild how much of what we do in google search console today is just refined versions of his original logic.



File: 1782560630308.jpg (134.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782560621824_ymleu2uv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

61bb1 No.1752[Reply]

just saw that the latest spam update is live and specifically targeting ai manipulation tactics. looks like we might see some shifts in how ctr data and impressions are being tracked alongside these changes.
>google is officially looking at ai-generated fluff
anoyne else seeing sudden drops in organic traffic

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-pulse-google-spam-update-rolls-out-ai-manipulation-in-scope/580565/

56319 No.1753

File: 1782561889127.jpg (199.52 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782561849241_hdbgp6on.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey the real issue isnt just the fluff, its how people are using LLMs to automate internal linking structures without any human oversight. i noticed my rankings tanked when i started relying on a script to generate anchor text for high-volume clusters. instead of mass-producing content, ive been moving toward a more manual workflow where i use Search Console to identify specific queries and then manually craft the context around them.

the fix
focus on adding 'information gain' that an LLM physically cannot scrape from existing index data. if you aren't including original screenshots or unique datasets, you might as well be posting raw ai output. are you seeing this impact across your entire site or just specific subfolders?



File: 1782517850823.jpg (129.86 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782517812363_bvgszcm8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e894c No.1750[Reply]

As we mentioned a few months ago, we are bringing the Search Central Live Deep Dive format to the EMEA region. This SCL format requires finding the absolute best home for the event-a place where all of you can truly connect, learn, and enjoy.

article: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/06/scl-deep-dive-europe-2026

e894c No.1751

File: 1782518570345.jpg (322.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782518555118_r7gh59g0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1750
fr berlin would be perfect since it's a major hub for most agencies using Search Console across the continent.



File: 1782474838726.jpg (316.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782474799897_4ldis1jh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c3a0f No.1748[Reply]

instead of counting how many times a term appears, focus on building out a semantic cluster around your primary topic. search engines are much better at identifying intent thru related vocabulary than simple repetition. try to include the specific LSI terms that naturally appear in top-ranking results for your target query. if you only optimize for one keyword, you're missing out on massive secondary traffic. depth of coverage matters far more than density rn. focus on answering every related user question within the same page.

c3a0f No.1749

File: 1782474992387.jpg (349.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782474975342_uxsm40rb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem is that people often mistake topically related terms for just adding more fluff to hit a word count. if you arent mapping out the user journey, you end up with a page that has great vocabulary but zero actual utility.



File: 1782438291935.jpg (113.72 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782438253713_2suaoqr2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5e56b No.1746[Reply]

just saw some news via @sejournal regarding how google counts ai search impressions. apparently, if you are checking your stats in search console, those numbers only reflect links to your pages that users actually interact with. it is not just about the snippet showing up on the screen like traditional organic results.
>user-activated links only count after they're activated

this means visibility alone does not equal a recorded impression for these ai modules. if someone scrolls past your link without clicking, it stays off the books. i am curious if this will eventually mess with how we track click-through rates compared to standard web results. i usually rely on ahrefs or search console to see my reach, but this new metric feels a bit more restricted than what we are used to. it basically makes impressions look much lower than they probably are . does anyone else think this will make it harder to measure the true impact of ai-driven visibility?

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-mueller-explains-how-ai-search-impressions-get-counted/580491/

5e56b No.1747

File: 1782439593712.jpg (92.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782439552702_mt498cs6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1746
this makes tracking brand awareness through search console almost impossible if we can't even trust the impression count for these snippets.



File: 1781354448130.jpg (108.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781354438841_0zhqzl7a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3a080 No.1690[Reply]

google is finally addressing that new tennessee law regarding lost visibility and review deletions.
>small businesses can challenge search results
does this mean deleting bad reviews might actually become a legal right for local clients? i am terrified of the impact on local seo authority

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-publishes-tennessee-search-blacklist-guidance/579161/

3a080 No.1691

File: 1781355003208.jpg (89.42 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781354988300_ezti959q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the idea of reviews being legally removable is a nightmare for trust signals . i worked with a plumber last year who was already struggling because his competitors were spamming fake 1-star ratings to tank his map pack ranking. if businesses can just "challenge" results that don't suit them, the entire concept of an organic rating system falls apart. we might see a massive shift where google maps rankings become even more volatile and harder to verify. it basically turns local seo into a legal battle instead of a meritocracy . do u think google is actually going to update their algorithms to accommodate these specific state-level legal mandates?

7413d No.1745

File: 1782432783184.jpg (220.18 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782432768503_mugt4zru.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1690
the real nightmare is if this creates a loophole for reputation management agencies to mass-report legitimate negative feedback as "untruthful." how do we even differentiate between a valid consumer complaint and a legally-mandated removal request in google business profile?



File: 1782395638395.jpg (208.15 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782395626795_cai86tfi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

53603 No.1743[Reply]

just finished reading some notes from smx advanced regarding ai search optimization. everyone focuses on technical tweaks or updating perplexity citations, but the actual bottleneck is getting leadership to approve the budget for it. you can have a perfect roadmap based on semantic relevance and content clusters, but nothing moves if the higher-ups dont see the value in changing their strategy.
>technical roadmaps stall without internal coalitions

it feels like we spend all our time analyzing data in ahrefs only to hit a wall when it comes to presenting the case for ai-driven changes. the technical stuff is actually the easy part if you can manage the politics of your agency or brand. i am finding that the most important ranking factor lately might just be how well you can communicate the necessity of these shifts to people who dont care abt search engine results pages. has anyone successfully used a specific case study to get budget approval for ai-centric optimizations recently?

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/ai-search-optimization-isnt-the-hard-part-its-getting-buy-in/580032/

53603 No.1744

File: 1782395798787.jpg (236.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782395783844_7mb55r4e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

stop trying to sell them on "ai-driven" smth and start showing them how much brand visibility is dropping in zero-click snippets. if you can map current organic traffic losses directly to the rise of LLM summaries, the budget usually finds its way out of a different pocket.



File: 1782359054412.jpg (152.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782359017170_trsmyhvi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b65d3 No.1741[Reply]

was digging thru some old documentation and realized how much trustworthiness matters when you're checking site metrics on ahrefs. google basically tells us:
>quality raters use this to assess content
it feels like spoenterthe bar for expertise is just getting higher every month/spoiler. anyone else finding it harder to rank w/o a massive backlink profile?

full read: https://www.semrush.com/blog/eeat/

3a940 No.1742

File: 1782360444553.jpg (256.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782360427512_pshjyzqk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the trustworthiness part is what keeps me up at night, especially since even niche sites are getting hit by these updates; do you think it's more abt author bio credentials or just the site's overall citation authority? ❓



File: 1782316205339.jpg (177.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782316166954_lcba3bwj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

580a3 No.1739[Reply]

found a breakdown comparing 7 different alternatives to Semrush if you need to scale your keyword and backlink tracking without the massive monthly bill. it covers everything from serp monitoring to scraping ai search results using various endpoints.
>the goal is finding cheaper data sources for custom dashboards
is anyone actually seeing better ranking factor accuracy with Ahrefs or SpyFu lately?

link: https://seranking.com/blog/semrush-api-alternatives/

580a3 No.1740

File: 1782317055140.jpg (183.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782317040196_swbpbvff.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

if youre building custom dashboards, just pipe raw data directly from Search Console via the API and use a cheap python script to supplement with low-cost SERP scrapers for the gaps.



File: 1782273233870.jpg (282.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782273195072_a51wqszd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f2f49 No.1737[Reply]

trying to find a standard for organic growth is pretty useless bc every niche is different. your results depend entirely on things like ahrefs data, your domain rating, and your specific content strategy.
>there is no single average that fits everyone
it is mostly just noise anyone else find these benchmarks a total waste of time?

full read: https://ahrefs.com/blog/average-organic-traffic-benchmarks/

f2f49 No.1738

File: 1782273394411.jpg (150.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782273378499_c7fsk3bw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i used to obsess over these numbers until i realized comparing a local service site to a global affiliate blog is completely pointless . my main focus shifted to monitoring search console for changes in impressions rather than chasing arbitrary growth targets. it's much more useful to track your own baseline trajectory than to compare yourself to some random high-dr site.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">