[ 🏠 Home / πŸ“‹ About / πŸ“§ Contact / πŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1779655286401.jpg (24.79 KB, 1080x665, img_1779655278959_os5aepzu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5f826 No.1635[Reply]

is it a gradual improvement in design practices or is there something fundamentally changing how we interact with technology? share ur thoughts!

0d1a1 No.1636

File: 1779655931025.jpg (167.47 KB, 1280x850, img_1779655917015_5y4xhacf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1635
push back on one assumption: isn't it possible that both are happening simultaneously? gradual improvements and fundamental changes can coexist, right?
> i've noticed a mix of new interaction paradigms and subtle UI tweaks in apps lately. how about you? have u seen similar trends where things feel different but also better at the same time? q

0d1a1 No.1647

File: 1779865010661.jpg (130.79 KB, 1080x720, img_1779864996354_k1q6fls3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

it more abt refining existing practices or is there a paradigm shift in user interaction? share ur thoughts!



File: 1779849587053.jpg (113.02 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779849578544_b25kurzj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

34e3a No.1645[Reply]

in our last meeting, someone brought up adding more widgets in figma's dashboard - 23 out of 40 calls mentioned it recently. should we validate this as a real problem or just move on? what are your thoughts about skipping initial validation steps sometimes work better than others?

found this here: https://uxdesign.cc/product-discoverys-quietest-most-consequential-decision-ea697471cf6f?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

34e3a No.1646

File: 1779849712420.jpg (97.62 KB, 1080x719, img_1779849697417_yas2qc2r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl i had a similar situation where we wanted to implement new features based on user feedback but found out later that it wasnt as critical an issue users thought at first glance after proper validation. so always take some time for initial checks, even if you feel like moving fast can save more work in the long run validation is key. yeah.



File: 1779813474571.jpg (173.09 KB, 1280x853, img_1779813465723_hbfoe7rf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

56aa5 No.1643[Reply]

i stumbled upon an interesting concept called vibe designing recently - where developers fully immerse themselves in their creative flow, letting intuition guide them rather than strict rules. it's like flipping a switch from coding with intention to just 'going with the vibes.' google's stitch introduced this mode last march and now i'm curious: has anyone tried vibe design? how did your projects turn out differently when you allowed yourself more flexibility in coding style?

article: https://uxdesign.cc/7-things-that-vibe-design-cant-replicate-014e3089f86e?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

56aa5 No.1644

File: 1779814035880.jpg (121.97 KB, 1080x718, img_1779814021579_qjcjx29u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1643
fr ive tried vibe design a few times, and its definitely different! i found that while my initial ideas were more creative, debugging became trickier because things didnt always line up as expected. one tip is to keep notes on what youre doing intuitively - that way if something goes haywire later,
>you can backtrack easier.

have u noticed any specific benefits or drawbacks with vibe design in your projects?



File: 1779777155199.jpg (118.07 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779777148474_1ongazwu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cd574 No.1641[Reply]

sundar pichai just said something that shouldnt have been comfortable for him. but it was me,the user, now seen as a principal! google promoted us. they showed off "delegated presence" with gemini. halfway through the keynotes i closed my laptop expecting to dive back in - nothing happened afterward like before (30 years of routine). rewind moment feels huge for ux design philosophy shifts?

full read: https://uxdesign.cc/you-are-no-longer-the-user-you-are-the-principal-3a6222e0780a?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

cd574 No.1642

File: 1779778329105.jpg (218.73 KB, 1080x720, img_1779778314750_qhe53b7q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

delegated presence: explore how it can streamline workflows without sacrificing user focus. __UNDERLINED PHRASE_ lol



File: 1779727324539.jpg (90.61 KB, 1280x853, img_1779727317568_0jrr36oh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4d385 No.1639[Reply]

ive been noticing a shift towards more personalized interfaces that adapt based on user behavior and preferences. its not just abt looks anymore;
>the experience now feels like an extension of oneself. really cool stuff!

4d385 No.1640

File: 1779727450632.jpg (153.8 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779727434220_3pinwmqh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1639
fr personalized interfaces really hit home when they remember small details over time, making each session feel tailored just for you.



File: 1779691114940.jpg (186.85 KB, 1080x719, img_1779691106006_f0retat8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

aa130 No.1637[Reply]

> when i focus on user needs first and let aesthetics follow, projects often end up looking better. but sometimes a killer visual concept can drive usability in unexpected ways. what's your take?
i think both are crucial; they just balance each other out.

aa130 No.1638

File: 1779691671152.jpg (70.69 KB, 1080x720, img_1779691656464_2v4ed8xh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1637
ive seen projects where initial usability issues were overshadowed by a stunning visual design, only to fail in user testing.



File: 1779575872498.jpg (171.99 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779575863828_6w8cfwvx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc2c9 No.1631[Reply]

i found this cool article that talks 'bout mastering ai tools in design - its not just knowing how to use them, but rly making those AI helpers work w/ YOUR personal touch. kinda like when you pick up a pen and sketch smth uniquely yours every time! i wonder if anyone else has tried using figma for more personalized designs while keeping that 'master' feel?

article: https://uxdesign.cc/designing-how-designers-master-ai-642d8751d945?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

bc2c9 No.1632

File: 1779576409284.jpg (158.03 KB, 1080x703, img_1779576393457_1gi0k06o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1631
use custom icon packs in figma to give designs that personal touch! it's a small tweak but can make big differences



File: 1779539806231.jpg (279.04 KB, 1080x810, img_1779539799552_521qbm2h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

71913 No.1629[Reply]

if you're looking to streamline your prototype development without sacrificing quality or flexibility, consider comparing sketch vs figma.
sketch is a solid choice if <you prefer simplicity and are already invested in its ecosystem>. it excels with vector-based graphics but might feel limited when incorporating complex interactions.
figma offers real-time collaboration features which can be incredibly useful for team projects but requires some time to get used due to the learning curve. both tools support a wide range of prototyping needs, making them valuable additions depending on your workflow and project requirements

71913 No.1630

File: 1779540432208.jpg (76.01 KB, 1080x810, img_1779540416230_hgo67htx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

consider how you prioritize real-time collaboration vs tool simplicity and ecosystem familiarity for YOUR team's specific needs before making a decision btwn sketch & figma. both have their strengths, so pick based on what fits best!
>personal experience: my prev role found figma incredibly smooth once we got past the initial learning curve



File: 1779496805740.jpg (37.88 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779496799353_qum5dqfh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a9455 No.1627[Reply]

i've been reading up on wcag but it can be overwhelming. any tips or resources you'd recommend to make sure we cover all bases w/o overcomplicating the dev process?
accessibility guidelines
- wcag 2.1
> check out this interactive audit tool
keep user feedback loops simple and direct
be wary of overly complex ARIA labels, they can backfire.

a9455 No.1628

File: 1779496919652.jpg (117.63 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779496906161_z3neocht.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1627
i found a great resource on their official website that breaks down wcag 2.1 into simpler steps - makes it less overwhelming and easier to implement! also, try setting up quick wins first - it boosts morale without overcomplicating things much : )
>check out for a step-by-step guide



File: 1779460323785.jpg (259.47 KB, 1880x1249, img_1779460314007_6xdej614.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

06360 No.1625[Reply]

check out this fun experiment where images follow and bounce off mouse movements! ive been playing around in gsap for a while now, trying to recreate smooth physics-based interactions. what do you think about using similar effects on mobile devices? could it be too taxing or just right at the moment?

found this here: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/05/20/made-with-gsap-building-a-fun-gravity-based-mouse-trail/

06360 No.1626

File: 1779461315093.jpg (101.96 KB, 1733x1300, img_1779461300899_ketzrs0b.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1625
s on using gsap for mobile? it depends a lot on optimization - can you keep file sizes and performance in check while still achieving smooth interactions like those with mouse movements?

spoiler: i've seen some projects where.

sure animations are optimized well for both desktop & mobile to avoid lag. have u tested on real devices yet?



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / πŸ“‹ About / πŸ“§ Contact / πŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">