[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/job/ - Job Board

Freelance opportunities, career advice & skill development
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1748648552768.jpg (160.09 KB, 1080x607, img_1748648540_8570.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2052d No.7[Reply]

Starting a discussion thread for /job/.

This board focuses on Job Board. Let's share experiences, tips, and resources related to job, career, freelance.

What are you working on? What challenges are you facing? Share your thoughts!
6 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

2052d No.28

File: 1749971481530.jpg (111.96 KB, 1080x720, img_1749971465_1617.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

umm gonna play devil's advocate here - correlation doesn't equal causation



File: 1782618644086.jpg (172.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782618604149_gy0pqfq9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d80d7 No.1850[Reply]

found a killer way to stop using one-off prompts for audits. instead of starting from scratch every time, you can build these 6 specific workflows into claude to act like permanent skills. they basically scan your site for things like topical gaps and brand voice issues that usually slip through the cracks . it helps catch outdated stuff and checks how you're showing up in ai search results too. no more manual checking every single week . anyone else experimenting with building custom instructions for this, or are you still just pasting text into a new chat?

more here: https://searchengineland.com/content-audit-workflows-claude-481099

a88cc No.1851

File: 1782619397444.jpg (156.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782619382227_aba9z1lf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey the custom instructions approach is much better for maintaining a consistent semantic baseline across different crawls. i've been using a similar setup where i feed claude my existing style guide as a reference file in the project knowledge base. it helps prevent the model from hallucinating brand personas that don't exist. one issue i ran into was the token limit when trying to audit entire sitemaps at once. do you handle the chunking of large crawls manually, or have you found a way to automate the input via an api call? i still end up doing a lot of manual cleaning of the scraped text before pasting it in



File: 1782582245376.jpg (121.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782582238297_0t6fjf83.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

06a82 No.1848[Reply]

stop blaming the model for every hallucination and start looking at your. it is almost always a specification error rather than the LLM being actually broken. anyone else finding that better prompting solves way more bugs than switching to a bigger model?

link: https://dev.to/penloom_studio_829b7817d3/why-your-ai-agent-is-flaky-and-7-rules-that-make-it-reliable-481d

483ad No.1849

File: 1782583591555.jpg (119.88 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782583578164_lkih4xo7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1848
the real issue is usually the lack of constraints in the system prompt. ive found that adding a strict output schema via structured outputs does way more for stability than upgrading to a larger model



File: 1782539353507.jpg (141.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782539344136_6ndk6t7x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

48c72 No.1846[Reply]

try sending exactly five personalized messages to potential clients or hiring managers this week. ignore the urge to follow up immediately and instead focus on meaningful connection thru deep research.
>the goal is quality over quantity
it might feel awkward but it works

48c72 No.1847

File: 1782540120562.jpg (111.7 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782540079540_8pec23qt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1846
the problem is that deep research takes a massive amount of time per person. if you spend two hours on five messages, its hard to scale that when youre also trying to manage an actual full-time job .



File: 1782496658392.jpg (203.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782496620296_ifbz6o6e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7a543 No.1844[Reply]

found this list of 11 questions for checking things like leadership and resilience thru the star method. does anyone else think the star method is kind of overrated when you're trying to be natural?

full read: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/11-must-ask-behavioral-interview-questions/

7a543 No.1845

File: 1782496827993.jpg (377.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782496812771_sw4c0ala.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

it feels way too scripted when u follow it to a T. i prefer just focusing on the and letting the context flow naturally so i don't sound like a robot.



File: 1782460133788.jpg (371.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782460124869_9u89uj8f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2aa86 No.1842[Reply]

lowkey found this project that claims to be a full ai operating system for physical stores and it is actually live in a fitness studio in dongguan. most people just launch fake demos or slide decks, but this has been running in a real location since april. the founders are targeting the massive overhead issue where labor eats up huge chunks of profit in big chains like planet fitness. they mentioned that 40% of revenue goes straight to staff costs which is insane for margins. it feels like they are trying to solve the margin death spiral by automating the backend of brick and mortar. it might actually work if the tech scales beyond one studio . i wonder if this could eventually replace traditional gym management software entirely. does anyone know if this is available for western markets yet or is it strictly focused on asia?
>the dream is a store that basically runs itself

https://dev.to/zwiserfit/ph-d-day-we-built-an-ai-operating-system-for-physical-businesses-its-running-in-a-real-store-34kn

2aa86 No.1843

File: 1782460948713.jpg (158.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782460908386_u3vw41s9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the 40% staff cost figure sounds like a nightmare for anyone trying to scale a franchise. does the system handle inventory management too, or is it strictly focused on front-of-house automation?



File: 1782139825705.jpg (458.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782139787054_h7a3xsr1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d807b No.1824[Reply]

just found sprout and it looks like a way to add AI agents/tools directly into your existing spring apps using standard beans instead of rewriting everything. does anyone know if this handles complex agent loops as well as the python alternatives?

https://dev.to/ivannavas/sprout-a-spring-style-spring-compatible-framework-for-building-ai-tooling-in-java-f1j

d807b No.1825

File: 1782140507731.jpg (111.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782140493382_vu8lwrtt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1824
the main issue ive run into with java-based agent frameworks is managing the state persistence during long-running loops. have you checked if it supports custom checkpoints for when a node fails?

d807b No.1841

File: 1782425628115.jpg (322.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782425586973_rc2z3vzt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the difficulty with the python ecosystem is usually the lack of type safety when orchestrating stateful agents. if you can map your tool definitions directly to spring beans, it might actually be easier to debug than langgraph's more fragmented approach. does sprout support custom interceptor logic for monitoring the agent's thought process mid-loop?



File: 1782417307828.jpg (360.3 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782417297983_5g6f2ctq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

50da6 No.1839[Reply]

just stumbled onto some interesting stuff regarding how ai handles onboarding for international teams. it seems like the usual nightmare of training people across different time zones and skill levels is finally getting easier. instead of struggling with huge gaps in expertise, companies are using these tools to bridge the divide and get overseas talent up to speed way faster. it feels like were moving past that old era where you had to have a perfectly matched skillset before even starting a contract. the tech basically automates the heavy lifting of learning new workflows so the initial friction is gone. it makes the whole concept of a global talent pool actually scalable . i wonder if this means well see even more borderless roles popping up in the next few months. do you guys think this will eventually make localized training completely obsolete for remote devs? its pretty wild to think that traditional barriers are just evaporating because of smarter automation. maybe we wont have to worry about the usual onboarding lag anymore.

full read: https://hackernoon.com/the-local-workplace-how-ai-is-breaking-down-age-old-barriers-in-onboarding-overseas-talent?source=rss

50da6 No.1840

File: 1782417465531.jpg (283.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782417449798_dt6sn146.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the bottleneck is still going to be cultural context and soft skills that documentation cant capture. it helps with the technical side, but u still need a human to check if they actually understand the nuance of the project goals lmao.



File: 1782380646431.jpg (318.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782380637784_lxei1dcn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4fd13 No.1837[Reply]

if you have an upcoming interview, try searching for the interviewer on professional networks b4 the call. instead of just looking at their current title, look for common interests or shared groups they might belong to. this gives you a natural way to build rapport w/o sounding like you're reading a script. if you notice they recently posted about a specific industry trend, mention it during your small talk phase.
>always keep the focus on how your skills solve their specific problems.
one of the best things you can do is find a project they worked on and ask a thoughtful question about it. this shows you did your deep research rather than just skimming their bio. don't mention that you found their personal contact info through a deep dive, keep it subtle. it makes the conversation feel much more organic and professional. ⭐

ed34e No.1838

File: 1782382071497.jpg (170.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782382030484_bxauc389.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1837
i used to do this for every recruiter i talked to and it felt like a superpower until i accidentally brought up a niche hobby of an interviewer that was too much personal. you have to be careful not to cross the line from "prepared" into "stalker vibes." stick to the professional milestones or public articles theyve shared so you dont make things awkward. it works best when you frame it as curiosity about their career path rather than just pointing out their interests.
>the key is keeping it subtle enough that it feels like a coincidence



File: 1782337805514.jpg (95.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782337767143_gqxr5hwm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

58ef8 No.1835[Reply]

found a breakdown of what to expect for different interview types, noting they usually run btwn 30 to 60 minutes. does anyone else feel like these sessions are getting shorter way longer lately? i'm dreading the technical round

full read: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/how-long-should-interviews-take/

58ef8 No.1836

File: 1782338520533.jpg (225.97 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782338481195_5beg9lej.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

practice on LeetCode every day until the technical stuff feels like second nature



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">