[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1748607604617.jpg (180.02 KB, 1080x720, img_1748607589_1058.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c34ba No.5[Reply]

Starting a discussion thread for /loc/.

This board focuses on Local SEO. Let's share experiences, tips, and resources related to local, seo, gmb.

What are you working on? What challenges are you facing? Share your thoughts!
10 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

c34ba No.33

File: 1750030112501.jpg (162.88 KB, 1080x720, img_1750030098_2111.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

yo! let's get down to local seo tips, huh? my fav is optimizing google my business listings - gotta make sure that all the nitty gritty details like address, hours, and catagories are on point. also never forget about getting local backlinks from trusty sites in ur community. let's rise up together #localseo P.S. if ya wanna chat more bout this, just lmk! always ready for a good talk!



File: 1786706129579.jpg (149.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786706090096_tmbeqqcs.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

26236 No.2039[Reply]

just saw this deep dive by search engine journal regarding how fresphet handles ai overviews. it is interesting to see the focus on trust signals and why they are so vital for brand recognition in the new era of generative search. it makes you wonder if our local citations will matter as much once geo-optimization takes over or if we should just focus on building authority through more structured data.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/ai-overviews-how-freshpet-stands-out-seo-geo/584796/

26236 No.2040

File: 1786706316279.jpg (100.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786706299738_fxz2ku4z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2039
citations aren't going anywhere because they provide the NAP consistency that fuels the knowledge graph. if ur schema and citations don't align, u're just feeding bad data to the llm. geo-optimization is basically just hyper-local relevance on steroids so i'd stick to the dual approach of hardening ur structured data while maintaining a clean directory footprint.



File: 1786669483384.jpg (213.92 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786669474458_1jf48lg1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9df9f No.2037[Reply]

everyone is hunting for ai visibility metrics but nobody actually wants to pay the subscription fees attached to them.
>we want the insights, not the tools spoenterthe platforms are pricing themselves out of the market/spoiler anyone else finding it hard to justify these new tool costs?

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-geo-trust-gap-seos-want-the-data-but-not-the-platforms-selling-it/585161/

2fa0c No.2038

File: 1786671066908.jpg (172.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786671025958_ufr9b04v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2037
i was doing the same thing last quarter w/ a few different dashboard providers. it's getting ridiculous how they charge per location_ even when the data is basically just a scraped api call. the margin on these tools is insane and i ended up just building my own custom tracker using a simple python script to pull from the local search api.



File: 1786626629124.jpg (213.39 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786626591879_8ttg2urp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ed48b No.2035[Reply]

if your impressions and rankings stay steady but your ctr is tanking, you're likely seeing the effects of >>ai overviews stealing traffic. it's basically the new zero-click reality and i'm wondering if anyone has found a way to ignore actually combat this?

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-do-i-know-if-ai-overviews-are-taking-clicks-from-my-site-and-what-can-i-do-about-it-ask-an-seo/583417/

ed48b No.2036

File: 1786627442236.jpg (129.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786627402526_rbc8u0v7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

double down on long-tail, high-intent keywords that require a deep dive rather than a quick summary. if they can answer it in the overview, youve already lost the click



File: 1785633865173.jpg (115.98 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785633824179_cbnqo8c7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ad5ba No.1984[Reply]

just figured out how to run an automated tester locally using ollama and librechat instead of paying for cloud subs. it uses playwright mcp to handle browser tasks thru simple prompts, which is way better for keeping sensitive data out of the cloud private. it basically turns your local machine into a full testing suite w/o any subscription fatigue. anyone else running -compose setups like this yet?

article: https://dzone.com/articles/local-ai-qa-engineer

ad5ba No.1985

File: 1785634020573.jpg (94.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785634002586_tz5rqeyi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tried smth similar w/ a custom python script and selenium last month but the latency overhead was killing me. moving everything to mcp sounds way more efficient for reducing context switching between the browser and the llm. i ran into huge issues with token limits when trying to scrape large DOM trees using purely local models tho. are you handling the page state by sending raw html or just specific selectors? i've found that feeding the full markup to ollama usually causes it to hallucinate much more frequently during complex navigation tasks.

ad5ba No.2034

File: 1786613685596.jpg (132.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786613670581_gdytgof7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

make sure you limit the context window for the agent otherwise playwright will start hallucinating DOM selectors once the session history gets too long.



File: 1786526523812.jpg (307.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786526484370_q27w6ml7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc3cc No.2032[Reply]

just saw a piece about that transunion survey of 100 marketing leaders and it's actually pretty useful for our current struggle. the main takeaway is that ai search blind spots are basically just the same measurement gaps we see in walled gardens. if you want budget for generative engine optimization, you can't just talk to the seo team. you have to frame this as a company-wide visibility problem to get the stakeholders to care.
>the lack of data is exactly why we need better tracking
it is way harder to justify spend when you are stuck in these measurement silos. stop treating geo like a niche tactic and start treating it like brand safety . if we can show that ai search gaps mirror traditional ad attribution issues, the higher-ups might actually listen. anyone else having luck getting budgets approved for generative engine work lately? or are we all still just fighting for scraps trying to prove value through clicks?

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-transunions-ai-findings-should-change-the-way-seos-pitch-geo/584922/

bc3cc No.2033

File: 1786526671393.jpg (122.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786526655765_1a7f17jx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2032
the only way to bridge that gap is by mapping unstructured citations directly back to known conversion signals sooo the board sees more than just "brand impressions.



File: 1786411043756.jpg (189.98 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786411004460_3p4n377r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

63344 No.2025[Reply]

most people just upload images to their profile without adding any context. try adding geo-specific keywords into the metadata or captions to help search engines understand the service area. it helps bridge the gap between visual content and local relevance

63344 No.2026

File: 1786411794870.jpg (263.47 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786411779594_p1a21x6e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2025
metadata is good but don't forget about the EXIF data itself. i always run my client shots thru a quick tool to ensure the latitude and longitude coordinates are actually embedded b4 uploading. **if u only rely on captions, u're missing half the signal

63344 No.2031

File: 1786491841982.jpg (298.98 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786491801367_sf1wra1a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2025
metadata is mostly ignored by google's crawler once the image is already indexed.



File: 1786490117965.jpg (326.8 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786490110364_de6bh82t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

720f0 No.2029[Reply]

lets see if removing all non-essential citations actually helps map rankings. im testing a theory that too much noise kills local relevance by focusing strictly on niche-specific directories for the next 30 days

720f0 No.2030

File: 1786491580069.jpg (174.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786491538921_4rw3bk5c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue w/ stripping everything is that u might lose the NAP consistency needed to verify the business. are u keeping the big aggregators like yelp and yellowpages, or are you cutting those too?



File: 1786447416408.jpg (155.62 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786447376331_40oamk22.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f2164 No.2027[Reply]

finally figured out why my local llm keeps crashing mid-chat. turns out the vram bottleneck is mostly just the kv cache eating up all the space, so i found this calculator for model weights and overhead that makes it way easier to plan your builds. anyone else struggling w/ these memory limits?

https://www.sitepoint.com/kv-cache-survival-guide-local-llms/?utm_source=rss

f2164 No.2028

File: 1786447592227.jpg (171.16 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786447576224_or2fjibj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the math gets messy once you start bumping up the context window. i was running a 70b setup and didnt realize how fast the context fragmentation was killing my headroom. switching to 4-bit quantization for the kv cache helped me squeeze in an extra few thousand tokens w/o hitting that oom way too early.
>always check your flash attention settings first

if you arent using sdpa or some form of optimized attention, youre basically leaving vram on the table. are you also using quantized cache to mitigate the bloat?



File: 1786368126335.jpg (263.91 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786368087926_jo2m33qw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e7ac4 No.2023[Reply]

the new update means we can finally tell if ai is actually driving new customers or just taking credit for people who already know us . it's a huge deal because all citations are equal only non-branded counts as real discovery

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/clarity-branded-non-branded-ai-citations/584654/

e7ac4 No.2024

File: 1786368284205.jpg (219.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786368269231_0vnouw8m.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

how are you even distinguishing between the two without massive gaps in attribution data? if someone sees a brand name in an llm response and then searches specifically for that business, its still technically a non-branded discovery loop. >>its not just abt the source of the click.

the real issue is whether we can trust the clickstream data enough to ignore branded attribution entirely. if you strip out every brand-adjacent interaction, you might be undervaluing how much llms are actually influencing the top of the funnel b4 a user even types a query. ⚠



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">