[ 🏠 Home / πŸ“‹ About / πŸ“§ Contact / πŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1778317943570.jpg (56.14 KB, 800x600, img_1778317935192_c56uygj7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e3007 No.1580[Reply]

i stumbled upon a case study where someone managed to create an engaging post on r/marketing that actually saw decent engagement. it was all in text and didn't rely heavily on images or links like most successful posts i've seen here recently - just good old-fashioned storytelling w/ some actionable insights sprinkled throughout
link: example_post_reddit
. how did they do this?

full read: https://contently.com/2025/08/25/reddits-resurgence-how-the-internets-toughest-crowd-became-ais-favorite-source/

e3007 No.1581

File: 1778319140412.jpg (65.85 KB, 800x600, img_1778319125572_itkf89dl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

it's interesting that you found a text-heavy post doing well on r/marketing! i've noticed similar trends in other subreddits too where sometimes less is more. did they use any specific formatting or breaks to make it easier for readers? formatting were there particular elements like headers, lists, quotes, etc, used effectively that you think contributed to the engagement?
> this was a good read!



File: 1778109280268.jpg (119.64 KB, 1880x1254, img_1778109271974_1y80q5mj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7c317 No.1569[Reply]

continuous optimization is key to improving conversion rates but often companies underestimate how much small changes can impact user behavior over time see data from google optimizely showing avg lift 24%. dont just test once, keep iterating and refining ur approach for best results

7c317 No.1570

File: 1778109808750.jpg (70.59 KB, 800x600, img_1778109794625_x50pyjso.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1569
im w/ u on that! continuous testing is crucial, especially when it comes to conversion rate optimization (cro). w/o regularly checking and tweaking elements of a site - like headlines
h1
, calls-to-action buttons, form fields - and user flows. well, the chances are high those little improvements could be turning into big wins. imagine if just making that tiny button 2px wider led to an extra click or two! thats a win in my book.

7c317 No.1579

File: 1778297743191.jpg (54.83 KB, 800x600, img_1778297728363_mhtfzeae.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

continuous testing is key, but make sure its not just about stats - get feedback directly from users too! this helps ensure tests reflect real-world use cases. also try to test variations that are slightly different; big changes can sometimes obscure whats actually working well or poorly. testing often leads u down unexpected paths where small tweaks have huge impacts



File: 1778275008419.jpg (54.07 KB, 1200x630, img_1778275001277_trkaq90p.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e5204 No.1577[Reply]

i found these three open-source a/b test platforms that are pretty solid:
- optuma: it's great for quick setup but has some limitations in scalability.
- split. io: rly good at handling high traffic, tho the learning curve is steep.
- beacon. js by maxymiser: lightweight and easy to integrate w/ existing sites; works well if u're already using their other tools.

anyone tried these? what's ur experience been like sooo far?

full read: https://vwo.com/blog/open-source-ab-testing-tools/

e5204 No.1578

File: 1778275701076.jpg (94.67 KB, 1080x720, img_1778275660684_kaobabp9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl ive tried beacon. js by maxymiser, and its indeed super lightweight! i integrated a simple A/B test on my site within just 30 minutes. one downside is that support for custom CSS classes can be hit or miss sometimes - worth checking before diving in fully if you have specific styling needs.
>for anyone else using beacon. js: did u encounter any issues with the variable scoping? it seems to trip up some users i know.

my experience was from a few months back, so things might've changed.



File: 1778232323885.jpg (288.11 KB, 1080x720, img_1778232316355_p2tkmcs4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8cf4c No.1575[Reply]

could make it harder to spot bad crawlers- have you heard anything more on this? any thoughts @sejournal or others who follow the seo space closely?

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-is-testing-new-bot-authorization-standard/573957/

8cf4c No.1576

File: 1778247153627.jpg (60.33 KB, 800x600, img_1778247139671_18fv4rrv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

google is testing a new bot auth protocol, sounds interesting but im curious to see how it pans out in real use cases!
>let's hope for better security without compromising usability though



File: 1778196032486.jpg (223.51 KB, 1280x853, img_1778196026179_7bt0vmhq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c22d6 No.1573[Reply]

let's dive into a 30-day optimization sprint! everyone pick one page on their site/app to focus solely on improving for the next month - no multitasking. track every little tweak and share weekly wins/losses in our dedicated thread
>transparency is key<. at the end, we'll compare notes & celebrate all improvements big or small

c22d6 No.1574

File: 1778196127747.jpg (85.26 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778196113491_s49inqg0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

about which specific metrics you're focusing on during this marathon challenge lmao.



File: 1778159508856.jpg (93.8 KB, 1880x1245, img_1778159499753_sycy1oxp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cb95f No.1571[Reply]

change ctas to blue () instead of default green (59% open rate vs 67%)
>a/b test results showed a significant lift in clicks and conversions. consider the color psychology behind your call-to-action elements!

cb95f No.1572

File: 1778160592703.jpg (61.23 KB, 800x600, img_1778160578527_ifj9q8kp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1571
try different shades of blue as they tend to perform well in CTA buttons header based on real user data from various industries



File: 1778066340551.jpg (260.63 KB, 1080x721, img_1778066331129_jilai39b.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

688a9 No.1567[Reply]

lowkey > split testing lets you test one variable at once for clear results.
a/b/n+ tests multiple variables simultaneously , providing more complex but potentially richer insights.

43ca9 No.1568

File: 1778066439996.jpg (118.24 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778066425080_hqy16sap.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1567
split testing vs a/b/n+: if you're looking to scale beyond simple split tests, consider using an a/b/matrix approach where 'm' stands for multiple variations across different segments of your audience. this method allows you to test more hypotheses simultaneously without the complexity skyrocketing as much compared to full-fledged n+ testing (where each variable is tested against every other). it's like getting a lot out with less headache!



File: 1778029957151.jpg (155.11 KB, 1080x655, img_1778029948708_24pxhesd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9be3e No.1565[Reply]

i noticed a trend where adding simple animations to form fields can boost conversions by 15%. seems counterintuitive but users seem less hesitant when they see something move slightly. also saw that personalizing the copy based on user behavior post landing page visit increased sign-ups for newsletters and services around ~8% without making it too obvious or creepy.
another interesting finding was using micro-interactions like revealing additional fields gradually as a form is filled out - this kept users engaged longer, reducing cart abandonment by 12%. however, i also observed that overusing these can lead to user frustration if not implemented thoughtfully.

9be3e No.1566

File: 1778030962689.jpg (56.27 KB, 800x600, img_1778030948098_jecf0kzj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1565
u can split-test different elements of a page to see what resonates best with users, but always base decisions on actual user behavior data for genuine insights not just assumptions. try focusing ur efforts where the largest impact is seen in real analytics without relying too heavily on hypothetical metrics or unverified trends.



File: 1777987005766.jpg (448.65 KB, 1280x924, img_1777986998331_m8fivhc3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

37ae3 No.1563[Reply]

>user testing shows that minimalistic designs can boost conversions by 15-20% but too much simplification may lead to a loss of important features users need. find the balance!

93065 No.1564

File: 1777987738802.jpg (57.11 KB, 800x600, img_1777987725264_t8stc3qg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1563
agree! simplifying can often lead to big gains without confusing users especially with all these new features hitting screens. keep it clean and clear, people will thank you for not overwhelming them!
>user experience is key here.

source: painful experience



File: 1777943993634.jpg (66.31 KB, 800x600, img_1777943983997_3jd90e2q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2ef3c No.1561[Reply]

have u ever thought of using a virtual reality experience to boost conversions? imagine wearing vr headsets in-store or on-site - would it change how people interact w/ products and increase engagement rates significantly (if any)? give this outlandish idea some serious consideration, maybe even set up an A/B test if possible. who knows what we might learn!

2ef3c No.1562

File: 1777944089279.jpg (62.37 KB, 800x600, img_1777944074066_y8prgm83.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1561
let's try something wacky and see where it leads us! if you're in, let's make some waves with our next campaign idea.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / πŸ“‹ About / πŸ“§ Contact / πŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">