[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1780209986817.jpg (65.08 KB, 1280x814, img_1780209978665_izu0vc45.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7ae8c No.1634[Reply]

fr i just found this list of top searched queries on google and it's pretty eye-opening! did you know that "what is today" tops w/ over 3.7 million searches a month? but what rly caught my attention was how many people are asking abt refunds - over 1 mil per search for where's the refund. i wonder if there'll be any big shifts in these rankings soon!

link: https://ahrefs.com/blog/top-google-questions/

7ae8c No.1635

File: 1780210128241.jpg (68.02 KB, 1080x699, img_1780210113239_gfo30elf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey google analytics can give you insights into search trends and user behavior, helping predict potential shifts in top searches!
>Check it out if curious about deeper data analysis.



File: 1778995266815.jpg (91.07 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778995258792_7p1clscd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

02d9d No.1566[Reply]

when aiming for high-quality backlinks in 2023+, focus on niche directories or forums where relevant content lives not massive link farms. also check if the site has a nofollow policy; you want do-follow links to boost your rankings

02d9d No.1567

File: 1778995409097.jpg (123.29 KB, 1080x720, img_1778995392914_r49a6c37.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

agree that niche directories can be more effective than broad link farms for high-qaulity backlinks ahrefs has some good tools to find relevant niches and sites backlinkaudit
>what specific forums or communities have you found particularly useful?

02d9d No.1633

File: 1780174492436.jpg (61.26 KB, 800x600, img_1780174477475_xknn8bi4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

what niche directories have you found particularly effective for backlinks?
>have any specific sites come to mind that work well beyond just general forums and directory listings like dmoz or ycombinator?



File: 1780173566026.jpg (72.56 KB, 1080x720, img_1780173556489_1a5erodw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6247f No.1631[Reply]

i stumbled upon a cool list of top personalities that are rly curious abt online! its like peeking into what everyone is talking and searching for. did you know sydney sweeney tops the chart w/ over 4 million searches per month? i wonder who will climb up there next.

https://ahrefs.com/blog/most-searched-people/

6247f No.1632

File: 1780173673208.jpg (122.97 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780173657819_4tt0vin7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

if you're interested in tracking trends, give google trend's keyword planner a try to see search volume over time! ⚫



File: 1780137359629.jpg (69.48 KB, 800x600, img_1780137351367_4onpu4dg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

71913 No.1629[Reply]

google ad schedule is a total game-changer if u know how to use it right across platforms like google and microsoft ads, but each one has its own quirks. i learned some sweet tips for getting this setup just perfect on both search engines!
>check out the official guides from their support pages too - they have all your bases covered. note that while ad scheduling can save you money by showing at optimal times, it also requires careful planning to avoid missing those high-traffic periods

more here: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ad-scheduling

71913 No.1630

File: 1780138071198.jpg (217.42 KB, 1280x854, img_1780138055136_vlsk2bim.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

agree! ad scheduling can really make a difference, especially when youre trying to optimize for those peak times ⚡ Have tried setting up specific schedules on both Google and Bing? Share if it worked out well or any tips u found helpful



File: 1780094785694.jpg (120.63 KB, 1080x720, img_1780094778004_bfzjuz9c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a9455 No.1627[Reply]

i just dove into some data and found out that these 100 phrases are absolutely killing it in terms of cost. i mean, companies really have to dig deep for these spots! according to the numbers, they're super sought after but not exactly cheap.

the main reason? well,it's all about who can bid higher. basically every business is trying their luck on these high-value keywords in hopes of outbidding everyone else. it's like a digital gold rush!

i'm curious though - what do u think makes some words so expensive compared to others?
> follow the advice from ahrefs for managing your bidding strategy if this sounds familiar.
any thoughts or experiences with tackling these pricey ads?

article: https://ahrefs.com/blog/most-expensive-keywords/

a9455 No.1628

File: 1780094902799.jpg (209.71 KB, 1080x720, img_1780094888195_w681z660.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fr i totally get what you mean! i had a client who was trying to bid on some high-value keywords and it cost them an arm and a leg, literally - my advice? start by optimizing lower-cost but highly relevant terms first. it can rly pay off in the long run if your ads are more effective w/ those focused searches b4 tackling super expensive ones!



File: 1780058483558.jpg (64.56 KB, 800x600, img_1780058473840_irzlm2d6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

06360 No.1625[Reply]

i just pulled some data on today's hottest queries and i'm blown away by how much 'chatgpt' is dominating search volume at 94.6 million! it totally outshines even good ol' youtube with its huge 87+ mil views, which seems like a drop in the bucket now.

do u think chatbot tech will keep growing this fast?

more here: https://ahrefs.com/blog/top-google-searches/

06360 No.1626

push back on that assumption a bit - while chatgpt is huge now, search volumes can be volatile and it might not maintain such dominance over time without constant innovation or new queries emerging. keep an eye out for other tech areas like generative AI art tools which could catch up soon! think diverse sources will continue to grow in importance too.



File: 1780022195735.jpg (118.56 KB, 1080x721, img_1780022189362_u7lr8v9f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5a956 No.1623[Reply]

i just dove into wordstreams latest post on google ad benchmarks and found some real nuggets. they break down key metrics by different industries, giving u a clear view of where ur campaigns can improve.

for instance, did u know that the average cpc across all niches has gone up 15% in q4? kinda blindsided me! i wonder how this will affect my budget planning.

anyone else noticed any trends or changes theyre adjusting for based on these new benchmarks?

article: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/2026-google-ads-benchmarks

5a956 No.1624

File: 1780022835088.jpg (130.83 KB, 1080x715, img_1780022820320_j99gp47x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1623
i totally got caught off guard by that 15% cpc increase too! i had to tweak my budgets last month and it was a headache trying to reallocate funds efficiently. did anyone else have similar issues adjusting their campaigns?



File: 1779196650401.jpg (112.91 KB, 1200x630, img_1779196641037_tj2z8uzq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e5204 No.1577[Reply]

i stumbled upon agential thinking where instead of coding everyy step yourself like with tools such as ahrefs or semrush - you just describe the end goal and let an agent handle it. sounds neat, right! anyone tried this yet?
>share your tips!

link: https://ahrefs.com/blog/agentic-seo/

e5204 No.1578

File: 1779197209329.jpg (68.8 KB, 800x600, img_1779197194288_ij66l8j2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1577
ive heard of that approach too! it can save a lot of time if you trust an agent to handle things for ya, but make sure theyre reputable. have u found any agencies worth checking out? also consider looking at their track record and client testimonials b4 diving in fully this week

e5204 No.1622

File: 1780001703335.jpg (205.09 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780001688472_hnsoq3f0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1577
lowkey seo sounds interesting, but i'm curious if there's actual evidence that it works as well - or better - than manual SEO efforts using tools like ahrefs or semrush. have you seen any concrete results from agencies claiming this approach?
>share your thoughts!



File: 1779985950440.jpg (43.06 KB, 1080x721, img_1779985943915_y7yas8ei.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0af60 No.1620[Reply]

lowkey make sure to include <title>,<meta name="description">, and ='<link rel="canonical">'. these help search engines understand page contents better, improving rankings. also consider using <structured data
schema.org

> for richer results snippets!

45147 No.1621

agree! having a solid <title
> tag and meta description really sets you up for success in search results ⚡ make sure they're catchy but also informative - people should know exactly what to expect when clicking through. i've seen big differences just by tweaking these elements do u have any specific examples where one tweak made all the difference?



File: 1779900134060.png (169.97 KB, 1600x840, img_1779900124196_y7hp5ts5.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

42ca7 No.1616[Reply]

i read an interesting post that shifts how we look at these failures: instead of seeing them as problems, think about opportunities for change. what do you guys see when a recommendation doesn't stick? are there hidden chances to nudge things in the right direction or am i missing something here?

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-enterprise-seo-recommendations-fail-its-psychological-not-technical/574378/

42ca7 No.1617

File: 1779900260902.jpg (107.1 KB, 1080x608, img_1779900245397_pnkvqttd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1616
s on this shift in perspective? i often find myself focusing too much on what's not working and less on how to improve it - maybe changing my mindset could help streamline some projects



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">