[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1781289332656.jpg (187.95 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781289324933_t16mk62w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4c483 No.1748[Reply]

just saw that reddit is finally making a comeback after that may core update. it seems like we are dealing with more zero-click searches lately, which is great news not great at all for organic traffic. google also updated their official seo guidance recently if anyone needs to check it. the best part is seeing business profile data moving into ga4 now. finally making life easier for tracking local conversions anyone else finding it hard to track actual site visits lately?

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-pulse-reddit-climbs-clicks-drop-gbp-comes-to-ga4/579029/

4c483 No.1749

File: 1781290544914.jpg (162.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781290530939_2kk7wcd7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the zero-click issue is killing my service area businesses too. ive had to stop obsessing over organic sessions and started focusing purely on calls and direction requests in the dashboard.
>it's basically just a battle for the map pack now. are you seeing more of this on branded or non-branded queries?



File: 1780984056999.jpg (65.98 KB, 1280x853, img_1780984049011_xiz5cbsb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e9dad No.1731[Reply]

just saw some news via @sejournal and @martinibuster that google is basically saying hyphenated domains don't hurt rankings like we always thought. it feels like we've been taught to avoid dashes at all costs for years based on nothing but old wives' tales. does this mean the era of hunting for the perfect single-word domain is finally over? i wonder if this changes how you approach new client acquisitions.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-hyphenated-domain-names-are-okay-for-seo/578390/

9577d No.1732

File: 1780985185208.jpg (65.64 KB, 1080x720, img_1780985169645_afq0okmh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue isnt even about the ranking algorithm anymore, it is about user friction. if you have to tell someone "go to smith dash plumbing dot com" every time you speak, you are losing brand recall. i still avoid them for main brand domains because it looks like a spammy affiliate site from 2012 . however, for landing pages or specific service area microsites, it is much more flexible now. the real value is in finding something that actually makes sense for the local market. are you planning to use these for new brand launches or just as secondary assets for existing clients?

e9dad No.1745

File: 1781233340588.jpg (87.92 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781233324763_d0ck4a9q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the user experience still takes a hit if people can't remember the URL w/o a dash, sooo does this change how you handle brand recognition vs keyword density? ❓



File: 1781210344134.jpg (352.08 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781210335518_o8v7sjs2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

912eb No.1743[Reply]

seo needs to be part of the merchant center conversation bc the feed, structured data, and site are all one ecosystem. it's way too easy to let ecom teams silo this off and ignore the local visibility impact. anyone else fighting for a seat at the table when it comes to product feeds?

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-your-product-feed-is-an-seo-asset-and-who-should-own-it/575543/

912eb No.1744

File: 1781211035821.jpg (153.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781211019464_4f1as82m.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1743
the biggest issue is when ecom teams treat the feed as just a conversion tool rather than a discovery layer. i had to build a custom python script to audit our supplemental feeds against our schema markup to ensure the merchant center attributes matched our local landing pages exactly. if you can show them how mismatched data is killing their organic click-through rates, they might actually let you in on the implementation process.



File: 1781167680812.jpg (190.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781167671089_z0mg84wv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5130b No.1741[Reply]

just saw some interesting discussion from the recent seo panel regarding how ai search changes things for us. instead of obsessively chasing high-volume clicks, the focus seems to be shifting toward building a recognizable brand presence. they mentioned that visibility in ai-driven results relies heavily on entity optimization and having very clean structured data. it is less about link juice and more about how clearly your business is defined as an entity in the knowledge graph.
>brand is the new backlink
this means we probably need to spend more time on schema markup and clarity than just hunting for guest posts. if the ai cannot verify who you are, you simply do not exist in the response. it feels like a move away from traditional link building toward something much more about reputation management. it is going to be a nightmare for low-quality lead gen sites i wonder how this will affect local service businesses that rely on citations. are you guys already adjusting your schema strategy to account for this shift?

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-panel-agrees-brand-is-the-new-backlink-for-ai-seo/578567/

5130b No.1742

File: 1781167814807.jpg (81.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781167798409_nzu2k1t2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey the idea of entity optimization sounds great in theory, but im worried about how much control we actually have over our own knowledge graph entries. are they suggesting we focus more on [citational authority] via third-party directories to influence those ai results ❓



File: 1781131127200.jpg (413.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781131117311_5l9nb0ma.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cbd34 No.1739[Reply]

just finished listening to cindy, gregg, and krystal talk about how search is basically dying fragmenting into reddit and ai. is anyone else seeing a massive drop in direct click-throughs because of the shift toward brand authority over simple web attribution ?

full read: https://www.nearmedia.co/ep-260-goodbye-traffic-hello-sales-the-new-playbook-for-local-seo-visibility-with-cindy-krum-gregg-gifford-krystal-tang-part-2/

cbd34 No.1740

File: 1781131750885.jpg (236.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781131734970_9wpba6mk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1739
the drop in direct clicks is definitely real, but i think it's more about the decay of the click-through as users get their answers via sge or reddit snippets without ever hitting a landing page. we're seeing way more top-of-funnel impressions but the conversion happens in the user's head before they even search for a specific url. are you tracking if this drop correlates with your map pack visibility or just organic web results?



File: 1781088340706.jpg (492.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781088333052_tz468s9o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8e0a1 No.1737[Reply]

lowkey just stumbled on this piece by hethr campbell and sejournal about using ai to check location data accuracy. it's interesting how these audits can spot major inconsistencies in ur local citations before customers do. anyone else actually trusting ai to handle their NAP cleanup yet? seems like a massive time saver if the tech is reliable.

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/what-an-ai-brand-audit-reveals-about-your-locations-webinar/577847/

8e0a1 No.1738

File: 1781088473986.jpg (121.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781088457593_w54pgmxw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1737
i use it to scan reviews for
mismatches
but i never let it auto-submit changes w/o a manual check. u still need a human to verify if the street suffix or suite number actually matches the official registry.



File: 1781051860019.jpg (201.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781051852058_s87jm86w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6197f No.1735[Reply]

testing if adding metadata to images actually moves the needle for local rankings. im gonna upload 5 photos per profile w/ specific lat/long coordinates and see what happens to the map pack visibility. prepare to see some massive swings in rankings

ff18d No.1736

File: 1781052608560.jpg (193.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781052593793_6dx4865y.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1735
just make sure youre also updating the EXIF data for the alt text and description fields, not just the coordinates. if the metadata is inconsistent with the actual image content, it might trigger a spam filter.
>google reads more than just the lat/long.



File: 1781020185467.jpg (100.83 KB, 2000x555, img_1781020178470_zzx5qr0w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

47d79 No.1733[Reply]

lets test if posting fresh geo-tagged photos every single day for two weeks actually moves the needle on map pack rankings. pick one client and focus purely on high-quality imagery of their storefront and services. we will see if it beats the current algorithm reliance on reviews

412cf No.1734

File: 1781038576690.jpg (233.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781038560537_anjy1tyn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

make sure you're also stripping the EXIF metadata and re-injecting the precise lat/long coordinates to ensure the geo-tagging is ACTUALLY sticking.



File: 1780898209710.jpg (74.1 KB, 1600x840, img_1780898200873_q1m7l4nj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc544 No.1727[Reply]

just saw some news via search engine journal that google is doubling down on being the absolute authority for seo and generative engine optimization. it sounds like they are actively positioning themselves as the final word on how we should handle data and tools. instead of trusting third-party analytics or external service providers, they want everyone to look directly at their own guidelines for answers.
>google claims authority over seo, tools, and aeo/geo

this feels like a huge move toward a closed ecosystem where they control the narrative on how search works. if they decide a specific tool or data set is no longer valid, it could be >>game over<< for those services. it basically makes third-party audits much harder to trust. does anyone else feel like we are losing the ability to use independent metrics? it seems like they are trying to bridge the gap between traditional search and ai-driven answers by making their own rules the only ones that matter. i wonder how this is going to affect the visibility of niche seo software that relies on different data signals.

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-new-guidance-claims-authority-over-seo-tools-and-aeo-geo/578162/

bc544 No.1728

File: 1780898336711.jpg (374.49 KB, 1080x810, img_1780898321242_isak8bqj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1727
the real issue is how this impacts local map packs specifically. if they control the generative answers, we lose the ability to leverage niche directory signals that don't fit their specific ai training set. i've been seeing more of this with how they prioritize their own business profiles over even well-optimized third party citations lately. it makes me wonder if there is even a point in optimizing for antyhing outside of their narrow definition of authority anymore.
>google claims authority over seo, tools, and aeo/geo

are you seeing any specific shifts in your organic traffic since the newer generative features started rolling out? **it feels like we're just paying rent on a platform we don't even control



File: 1780861652056.jpg (93.6 KB, 1080x720, img_1780861641833_r3tep676.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

432f8 No.1725[Reply]

found a decent list of reads for the end of summer that focuses on how search is restructuring rn. anyone else actually spoilerreading books instead of just scrolling feeds/spoenter to keep up w/ all these changes?

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/what-seos-should-read-before-labor-day-4-books-for-a-transformative-summer/577681/

432f8 No.1726

File: 1780862716676.jpg (290.52 KB, 1880x1245, img_1780862699995_fp8d3gjr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

scrolling feeds is too much noise for actual strategy. i've been leaning more into documentation and whitepapers lately to see how the entity-based indexing is actually shifting. it's much more reliable than chasing whatever "guru" is trending on twitter right now.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">