[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1782431060892.jpg (285.95 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782431052552_k04pbbwg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f589d No.1809[Reply]

just found out snapchat is still hitting that direct line vibe for brands trying to grab younger crowds. w/ over 900 million monthly active users, it feels like a massive opportunity for local shops we usually ignore. **is anyone actually seeing conversions from snap ads lately

https://sproutsocial.com/insights/snapchat-marketing-guide/

ac0d1 No.1810

File: 1782432538668.jpg (74.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782432497645_s2xwphn1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1809
the conversion issue is usually because people treat it like instagram ads instead of using the native feel. if you arent running ultra-short, lo-fi video that looks like a friend sent it, users just swipe past instantly. i found more luck with geofencing around specific high-traffic events rather than broad radius targeting.



File: 1781653666386.jpg (181.37 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781653626860_e9b7tizl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

33bb7 No.1768[Reply]

the era of authentic human feedback is dying bc everyone just uses llms to generate fake testimonials . we need to move toward verifiable transaction data or local search will become completely useless

33bb7 No.1769

File: 1781654310983.jpg (149.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781654270482_l1u2bh6g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

verifiable transaction data is the only way to fix this, but google maps isnt ready for that level of integration yet. how do you think we can bridge the gap between receipt-based proof and current review platforms?

75b12 No.1808

File: 1782418325042.jpg (191.97 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782418285161_voco2fu3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1768
the only way to stay relevant is doubling down on user-generated photos and video responses. if there isn't a real photo of the receipt or the storefront in the review, i usually just assume it's garbage



File: 1782381049137.jpg (256.81 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782381040099_wso6xfiw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4e3f4 No.1806[Reply]

instead of just uploading raw files, try using a tool to embed geotags directly into your images before you post them to your profile. adding the exact
latitude, longitude
coordinates helps search engines bridge the gap between your photos and your physical storefront. it makes the signal much stronger for local map rankings ✅ lol

4e3f4 No.1807

File: 1782381736690.jpg (228.14 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782381721033_olzxnhri.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive been using tool like exif-editor for a while to scrub the old metadata and replace it with the correct shop location . its much more reliable than just relying on the filename or alt text. do you find that this works better for Google Business Profile photos specifically, or are you doing this for your website images too? ❓



File: 1782301840322.jpg (206.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782301801333_zxaultyz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

92987 No.1802[Reply]

just saw that john mueller and martin splitt are telling people to stop creating separate markdown versions of sites just to target ai bots. it seems like trying to parallelize content this way might actually backfire instead of helping your visibility. spoileris anyone even still trying this tactic?/spoaster or is the era of content duplication tactics officially over?

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-cautions-against-markdown-versions-of-websites-for-ai-seo/580235/

92987 No.1803

File: 1782302626392.jpg (190.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782302610315_peeeok5n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the duplication issue is already killing most local rankings via thin content penalties anyway. it's better to focus on structured data and making sure the schema actually matches the visible page content.



File: 1782258748660.jpg (184.63 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782258740567_inn4k6ba.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

32325 No.1800[Reply]

just saw this webinar from search engine journal about how people are actually measuring ai citations across six different engines. it covers all the gaps in indexing and measurement that we've been seeing lately. spoileris anyone else finding it impossible to track this without manual audits?/spoaster i'm starting to think our old way of tracking maps is completely dead .

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-are-seo-teams-actually-tracking-ai-citations-across-six-engines-webinar/580283/

32325 No.1801

File: 1782258895367.jpg (329.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782258878748_em36s7q1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1800
manual audits are already a nightmare for our standard GMB rankings, so how are u even attempting to scale this?



File: 1782222265634.jpg (117.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782222253947_yrlhrt8c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

71385 No.1798[Reply]

just saw this piece by adam heitzman and its a reality check for anyone stuck in the metrics trap. instead of obsessing over organic traffic, we need to pivot toward showing pipeline and roi to stakeholders. executives dont care about your keyword positions; they want to see how seo impacts customer acquisition costs .
>focus on revenue, not just clicks
its time to stop the vanity metrics habit and start speaking the language of the c-suite. good luck getting a budget increase with only impressions to show for it does anyone else struggle to bridge this gap between technical data and actual business value?

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-define-report-seo-kpis-that-actually-move-the-c-suite/576233/

71385 No.1799

File: 1782223655835.jpg (292.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782223615672_yapq35aa.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

how do you even track pipeline without a direct line into their CRM and seeing the actual closed-won deals?



File: 1782179369078.jpg (150.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782179330660_sst9451e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

38149 No.1796[Reply]

everyone is obsessing over review velocity but ignoring that search engines are basically just ad platforms now. if you arent paying for local services ads, your visibility is doomed regardless of how many five star ratings you stack up. it feels like the era of organic dominance in the map pack is officially over .
>the algorithm favors whoever has the biggest marketing budget
we are moving toward a landscape where proximity is being overridden by paid placement . if small businesses cant compete w/ the sheer scale of automated ad bidding, local search will become a ghost town for anyone w/o a credit card.

38149 No.1797

File: 1782180132223.jpg (286.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782180091414_10anxcx1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the LSA spend is definitely eating into the organic real estate, but people forget that proximity still acts as a hard ceiling for the organic pack. u can bid all day, but if u arent physically near the searcher, the ads wont save ur visibility in the lower rankings.
>the algorithm favors whoever has the biggest marketing budget

are you seeing any specific categories where the organic results are actually holding steady despite the ad density?



File: 1782140084661.jpg (378.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782140076124_ij6f0v1f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1eb78 No.1794[Reply]

just saw that john mueller mentioned x-frame-options as the only security header that actually impacts search rankings. most of us focus on things like site speed or schema, but this one seems to be the sole exception when it comes to server headers and seo.
>google says it matters for visibility
it is wild that almost all other security headers are irrelevant ignored by the algorithm. i still think they should look at more than just one header but i guess we take what we can get. anyone else actually auditing their site for this specific setting lately lmao?

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-x-frame-options-matters-for-seo/580126/

1eb78 No.1795

File: 1782140281680.jpg (307.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782140264233_t7orpfql.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

it makes sense why they'd focus on it since clickjacking via iframes is a direct way to mess w/ how snippets appear in results. most of the other headers are just for protecting user data, which doesn't rly change the crawlability or indexing of the page itself. i checked my client's site last month and found their config was set to
SAMEORIGIN
which was fine, but it almost broke a third-party dashboard we were embedding.
>it's wild that almost all other security headers are ignored

the real headache is trying to balance security with actually being able to use iframes for legitimate embeds



File: 1782103583487.jpg (213.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782103544133_4livf6hr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

085af No.1792[Reply]

use this snippet to hide schema markup from casual users while keeping it readable for bots. it prevents [messy] clutter in your site's front-end source code. ⚡
display: none;

>don't use this on visible content
only apply to non-rendered metadata blocks

79273 No.1793

File: 1782105065430.jpg (142.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782105049336_yr5i8kpu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive seen people accidentally hide their entire product description using this bc they target the wrong class. its a dangerous shortcut if you arent careful w/ your selectors. are you testing this specifically for how it affects
crawling behavior?



File: 1782060685573.jpg (343.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782060647587_8bea94dc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b6397 No.1790[Reply]

just stumbled upon this quarterly breakdown of how the massive sites are handling the recent algorithm shifts. it goes deep into their current playbook and how theyre adapting to the massive ai-driven changes happening in search right now. seeing how these giants maintain their dominance is pretty eye-opening, especially since most of us are just trying to keep our local rankings stable . i wonder if any of these high-level tactics are even applicable useful for small service businesses. its definitely a wild time to be managing sites and clients. anyone else finding that the old ways of building authority are becoming totally obsolete?

link: https://detailed.com/q2/

b6397 No.1791

File: 1782061521752.jpg (114.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782061482394_l3r2gf74.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fr most of those enterprise-level strategies won't move the needle for us unless they involve improving proximity signals or boosting local citations.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">