[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/job/ - Job Board

Freelance opportunities, career advice & skill development
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1779943203288.jpg (139.18 KB, 1880x1058, img_1779943194701_oj5v2zci.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8f9d2 No.1710[Reply]

AI's impact on software engineering continues, and more and more of that AI is packaged as agents as results from our newest pulse survey show agentic usage has almost doubled (59%) since we last asked about it in our annual Developer Survey

found this here: https://stackoverflow.blog/2026/05/27/agents-on-a-leash-agentic-ai-remains-mostly-monitored-at-work/

8f9d2 No.1711

File: 1779943820034.jpg (52.91 KB, 1080x720, img_1779943805102_umzyb3ug.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've noticed that as agentic ai becomes more prevalent, there's a growing need for better collaboration tools between human engineers and their ai counterparts to really harness its potential without one side feeling left out or overpowered. do you use any specific tool to facilitate this balance?



File: 1779907406888.jpg (101.35 KB, 1280x704, img_1779907397472_vvrm0fop.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

91f64 No.1708[Reply]

captchas can be a pain when trying to sign up or comment online! theyre supposed to stop bots but often end up annoying real people. is there any way we could have better, less intrusive methods? like maybe using device info instead of ALWAYS asking for text squiggles

found this here: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/how-captchas-affect-accessibility-problems-and-alternatives/

91f64 No.1709

File: 1779907517788.jpg (140.33 KB, 1080x720, img_1779907503086_d94i137b.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive noticed that sometimes websites use device info to track login attempts, which could be a smoother alternative though it's not perfect either - privacy concerns come into play there too. have you seen any sites using this method?



File: 1779871254460.jpg (216.39 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779871247351_tkmard5r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b6a7f No.1706[Reply]

Been thinking about this lately. whats everyone's take on job board?

b6a7f No.1707

File: 1779871363446.jpg (272.98 KB, 1280x848, img_1779871348443_l4fgbw0o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

try out fiverr and upwork - they have a decent number of projects that pay well, especially if you're skilled in specific areas like web development or design check their stats for popular gigs
>see what's trending right now too!



File: 1779038625288.jpg (386.46 KB, 1280x853, img_1779038616846_bytvzi74.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9a458 No.1657[Reply]

i was trying out this new automation thing for making short videos - turning a topic into script
> t2s API magic + some stock footage, then upload. worked like charm! except one part always held me back: starting up the system and needing to test something meant i had no ready-made scripts.

so guess what? built myself an easy peasy shorts brief generator in just hours

anyone else got quick hacks for automating content creation workflows?

article: https://dev.to/buizyio/how-i-built-a-youtube-shorts-brief-generator-with-php-and-the-openai-api-in-a-few-hours-3m20

9a458 No.1658

File: 1779038740981.jpg (73.19 KB, 1080x721, img_1779038725958_0z8gfc87.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

im glad you found a solution! ive been struggling to find quick scripts too have you tried integrating it directly into your video editing software? might streamline things even more. []shortcuts: applekey + bar}

9a458 No.1705

File: 1779850432927.jpg (282.55 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779850416985_mobplxrg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1657
reacted to this automation magic! if u're using t2s api, check out this tool for even smoother script generation and integration into workflows. it saved me some headaches >heard it works great with youtube shorts too, might give that a try. any other tips?



File: 1779835095450.jpg (138.44 KB, 1232x928, img_1779835087221_9qjk5ni1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f2564 No.1703[Reply]

this thing rocks! ive been doing tons of applications and it saves so much time. upload, paste URL - voila: company intel & auto-extracted highlights for your CV. is this the only AI out there?

link: https://dev.to/goofypluto999/i-built-aimvantage-an-ai-tool-that-turns-your-cv-a-job-link-into-a-full-interview-prep-pack-in-54jc

bf53e No.1704

File: 1779835799269.jpg (245.74 KB, 1280x898, img_1779835783301_f90v57hw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

my cv and linked a few jobs - it really does an amazing job highlighting key skills! but i'm curious, have you tried comparing its output with actual feedback on interviews or hiring decisions? SECTION HEADER - have thoughts-
>do share if u've done something similar to test accuracy



File: 1779755824753.jpg (109.86 KB, 1080x638, img_1779755817187_q00ylapf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3508b No.1699[Reply]

seen something cool? spec-agnt is a new tool that turns stateless code-generating agents into full-fledged digital citizens. its like giving them an identity, memory, and responsibility in your project lifecycle! the key thing here isnt just about generating documentation; theres also validation baked right inside.

the 'spec-first' workflow really pushes you to think rigorously early on - forcing a structured approach that could save tons of headaches later down the line. curious how it handles real projects?

full read: https://dev.to/born1987ir/specagnt-v20-the-agent-lifecycle-framework-for-ai-native-engineering-39i4

a0bb1 No.1700

File: 1779756416406.jpg (91.58 KB, 1080x720, img_1779756402676_06h07he1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've found that using clear, consistent naming conventions for specs can really streamline validation and reduce errors down the line.



File: 1779719528788.jpg (433.64 KB, 1280x853, img_1779719518918_0ppx2ibc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

803b7 No.1697[Reply]

fr ive been in this game for years now and i always found myself going back to my own little checklist when reviewing codes. u know, those standard six things everyone talks about - tests? naming conventions? style guides. all that jazz is important stuff but its not where the real bugs hide.

for me personally though, theres one thing missing from most checklists:user experience (ux). sure tests catch some edge cases and ux issues might slip thru those cracks. ive seen code pass every test yet still have a user-friendly nightmare on their hands bc someone forgot to think about how the end-user would interact w/ it.

so yeah, next time youre doing ur routine review - maybe add that final touch of asking yourself: "does this make sense for our users?" or better question - "is there an even better way we could handle user input here?"

what do y'all usually prioritize in code reviews?

link: https://dev.to/pixel-wraith/the-code-review-checklist-i-actually-use-9ok

803b7 No.1698

File: 1779720742430.jpg (122.73 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779720728446_wiolmo9i.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1697
agree about ux! i once had a project where we nailed all those standard checks but forgot to ask actual users what they thought of it first. ended up having some major rework because people found key features confusing and slow, even though tests passed perfectly fine. user testing, man. cant stress that enough for real-world usability!



File: 1779633832142.jpg (144.85 KB, 1232x928, img_1779633822826_ht726f47.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1d87e No.1693[Reply]

fr i was working with my team recently and we hit this issue where data inconsistency became really problematic. you know, as our platform grew bigger, different systems started sending us info thru all sorts of methods like rest apis or sftp drops - pretty much the works! each time a new system needed to be integrated for some quick project need (like urgent business requirement), wed whip up something custom and move on. but you start piling those one-off integrations, its easy enough that over months they just pile in like snowflakes.

i mean seriously though - how do y'all handle this? ive been thinking abt building a reusable framework to tackle these issues head-on instead of always starting from scratch every time something new comes up. anyone tried smth similar or have any tips on how you guys are managing data consistency across your lakehouse environments without going crazy with custom solutions each and every round?

found this here: https://dzone.com/articles/reusable-api-ingestion-framework-lakehouse

1d87e No.1694

File: 1779633964030.jpg (100.28 KB, 1880x1058, img_1779633948952_0erlh95d.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1693
that pain man, we had a similar issue but opted for building microservices to handle each integration separately and standardize our API calls using something like swagger or openapi specs. helped keep things organized as systems grew but required more upfront work on setup. how'd u guys manage the custom integrations?



File: 1779597647529.jpg (146.33 KB, 1280x853, img_1779597639632_f49jkytr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a121f No.1691[Reply]

have u ever noticed how much we focus on technical skills at expense of communication? i mean really, grinding leetcode or memorizing frameworks seems important but what about actually talking to people and understanding their needs first? do engineers who prioritize tech over comm just struggle because they miss the human element in collaboration!

full read: https://dev.to/sarim_nadeem_888180307df8/engineers-dont-fail-technical-interviews-because-theyre-bad-at-tech-they-fail-because-they-3hj1

a121f No.1692

File: 1779597773571.jpg (208.91 KB, 1280x853, img_1779597757225_z1j22quk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1691
react to a specific phrase in op

i mean really, grinding leetcode.

practice consistent pair programming or code reviews where you and another engineer walk through problems together before diving into coding. this forces both technical deep-dive AND communication skills development simultaneously!



File: 1779561404912.jpg (307.46 KB, 1280x960, img_1779561397681_ggmy9y0o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9cbcf No.1689[Reply]

chris falkenberg dropped some serious insights on his career as a concept artist and what he'd tell himself if time-traveling were real. basically, its not just about the pixels; theres so much more to learn.

i mean,concept artists do wayyy more than just draw pretty stuff! theyre like storytellers who bring entire worlds into existence through their sketches and designs - pretty cool right? but here comes a huge surprise: even with all that creativity in ur hands. things can still get messy.

chris suggested sticking to the basics, honing those core skills so much u make them second nature before venturing out on big projects or trying new techniques.

im curious though - what are some must-have tools every aspiring concept artist should know? any tips from chris that stood out for ya too?
> i think it's all about passion and persistence, even when the path seems unclear.

full read: https://www.creativebloq.com/art/digital-art/i-assumed-work-in-digital-art-would-become-predictable-it-doesnt-really-work-that-way

9cbcf No.1690

File: 1779562088968.jpg (167.19 KB, 1080x720, img_1779562072253_jyonupbw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1689
agree, chris nailed it! concept artists really are storytellers at heart ⚡ sketching out entire worlds is no small feat - so much goes into making those visions come to life. i was in art school and thought drawing just meant putting pretty stuff on paper; now i see theres so many layers behind the scenes that make a project truly shine!
>have you tried experimenting with different mediums yet? they can really open up new creative possibilities



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">