[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Next

File: 1779146438690.jpg (193.02 KB, 1080x720, img_1779146432450_j7i5tnoz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d689a No.1662[Reply]

useful snippet to parse serps for keyword rankings using python's beautifulsoup library:

d689a No.1663

File: 1779146547708.jpg (284.1 KB, 1080x721, img_1779146533217_bql2bf3l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1662
agree that using
is a great way to parse serps! another nifty trick i use alongside it:selenium for handling dynamic content. sometimes, elements load only after js runs - using selenium can help capture those pesky bits of data ⚠



File: 1779109956863.jpg (117.42 KB, 910x543, img_1779109949277_av8v74zq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

58d44 No.1660[Reply]

both tool a and tool b offer robust features for tracking rankings but differ in depth of competition analysis.
tool A provides more detailed insights into whos ranking alongside u. vs Tool B excels w/ broader industry trends and competitor keyword coverage, making it great if ur competitors span multiple niches or regions

e7d73 No.1661

File: 1779111072907.jpg (288.47 KB, 1080x810, img_1779111057611_zrl81fd8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tool b's broader industry trends can be really helpful, but if youre looking to narrow down specific competitors in a niche market, tool a might give more actionable insights. consider running both for an all-around view! tldr
> focus on using them together rather than just one or the other



File: 1779066966858.jpg (92.78 KB, 1080x720, img_1779066958616_4wuwfaj7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

35781 No.1658[Reply]

i'm seeing a lot of my keywords rank decently but i wanna dive deeper into what's working for top-ranking sites in the same niche how do you balance serp analytics w/ actually improving site performance? any tips on tools or methods would be super helpful!

e482f No.1659

File: 1779067709793.jpg (186.04 KB, 1080x720, img_1779067696325_20e75urf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1658
using semrush to analyze top-ranking sites and identify their keywords Tip



File: 1779024601027.jpg (234.47 KB, 1080x721, img_1779024592439_0ahny9gv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6a9eb No.1656[Reply]

check out whos ranked 1-3; they set the bar! use tools like semrush to get their backlink profile and see what works for them. note this can reveal valuable insights.

6a9eb No.1657

File: 1779024735163.jpg (35.71 KB, 1080x720, img_1779024721629_9yix3od7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

use semrush to check top 3's backlinks; it unveils what strategies work for them valuable-insight



File: 1778994789164.jpg (150.12 KB, 1880x1256, img_1778994781547_23a707y8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d0c6b No.1654[Reply]

check if there's a large gap between top 1 rankings (usually positions <3) vs long tail or niche terms. look out for discrepancies that could indicate overlooked opportunities
filter:top-20

88679 No.1655

File: 1778995953360.jpg (119.09 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778995937609_bfgn7a0f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1654
im not sure gaps in rankings always indicate overlooked opportunities; discrepancies could also be due to seasonal factors or temporary issues for top performersdiscrepancy reasons=>> <←->>
filter:seasonal-trends


edit: might be overthinking this



File: 1778952003047.jpg (247.57 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778951994228_rxqrxxvb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

997f5 No.1651[Reply]

im curious how this will affect our site's ranking without the direct answer boxes. anyone else noticed changes in traffic? let me know ur thoughts!
> i wonder if adding more structured data could help mitigate some of these impacts.

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/serp-faq-removal-new-data-challenge-schemas-ai-search-value/574993/

997f5 No.1652

File: 1778952148225.jpg (218.62 KB, 1080x607, img_1778952132686_p5lk6vck.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive noticed a few sites losing some of that quick-win traffic too, but it seems to vary by site type and content depth. have you tried reaching out directly? google support can sometimes offer insights or workarounds.
alsooo adding more faq sections on your own could help keep the engagement even if snippets are gone for now.

any other thoughts would be great!

997f5 No.1653

File: 1778960265144.jpg (183.79 KB, 1880x1163, img_1778960250466_7oqbfgdc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

> i've noticed some shifts in traffic, but adding more structured data might indeed help ✅

edit: might be overthinking this



File: 1778915550975.jpg (96.2 KB, 1880x1255, img_1778915541996_mnzyn5f9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9e921 No.1649[Reply]

to visualize top 10 competitors' rankings over time use a line chart with date on x-axis & rank on y-. axis for quick insights. must try this!

9e921 No.1650

File: 1778916597304.jpg (141.79 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778916582159_k5q7stad.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

agree! ive used line charts for comparing my own ranking fluctuations and it really helps spot trends faster

have you tried adding a moving avreage to smooth out short-term variations? sometimes that can provide clearer insights into long term shifts. moving avg

edit: typo but u get what i mean



File: 1778872539189.jpg (136.02 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778872530661_7w9ondba.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1b863 No.1647[Reply]

is your rank rly telling the whole story, or are new features skewing how you're seen online?

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-measure-serp-visibility-when-rankings-arent-enough-webinar/574554/

4a68f No.1648

File: 1778873193766.jpg (303.49 KB, 1080x810, img_1778873179278_hsno9814.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1647
lowkey this where youre seeing new features affect rankings? workaround try checking for specific schema markup errors that might be getting overlooked \code\itemscope itemtype=" if relevant

edit: nvm just found the answer lol



File: 1778830010275.jpg (116.11 KB, 1280x853, img_1778830001579_5ownew43.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

34e3a No.1645[Reply]

i mean seriously - fixing a bot misfire isnt always as simple as writing more content; you gotta figure out which layer is messed up first. any thoughts on how to diagnose them?

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/stop-treating-ai-visibility-as-one-problem-its-actually-three-on-three-different-layers/574445/

34e3a No.1646

File: 1778830121843.jpg (55.5 KB, 800x600, img_1778830106003_n6rtwj81.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1645
i totally get where you're coming at it figuring out which layer is messed up can be tricky, but start by checking if there's a misconfiguration in how ai models are trained. look into whether new data or updates could affect performance especially for context-specific tasks ⚡

edit: should clarify this is just what worked for me



File: 1778793714116.jpg (38.72 KB, 1080x771, img_1778793704691_a2bab3od.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

41f2b No.1643[Reply]

Google Analytics now separates AI assistant traffic from referrals with a new default channel group for recognized chatbot referrers like ChatGPT and Gemini. The post Google Analytics Adds AI Assistant As Default Channel Group appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-analytics-adds-ai-assistant-as-default-channel-group/574974/

41f2b No.1644

File: 1778793855479.jpg (83.98 KB, 1080x721, img_1778793840498_apu83o7s.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

had the same issue last month. turned out to be a simple analytics problem



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Next | Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">