[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1786086715885.jpg (136.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786086707913_tpu8izi6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0c7cc No.2023[Reply]

seeing everyone move from google searches to just asking chatgpt for vendor picks makes answer engine optimization feel mandatory. i've been digging into how the hubspot tool stacks up against peec ai for tracking these visibility shifts, especially since spoilertraditional organic rankings might be becoming secondary. does anyone else think we should stop obsessing over blue links and focus entirely on ai citations?

link: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/hubspot-vs-peec-ai

e7ac4 No.2024

File: 1786088213387.jpg (192.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786088172436_750nj70w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem with ditching blue links entirely is that brand authority still feeds those citations. if you arent winning the traditional search estate, theres no high-quality data for the LLM to scrape in the first place. ive been testing a workflow using python scripts to check if our product names appear in recent perplexity crawls, and its much more volatile than hubspot's tracker.

don't ignore the sitemap; ai bots still rely on it for discovery. ⭐


File: 1786072373060.jpg (117.41 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786072334511_e5vrzi8f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5ad3c No.2022[Reply]

Noticed something interesting lately in the serp analysis space. Things seem to be shifting towards a more practical approach.

Anyone else seeing this?

File: 1785986613108.jpg (357.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785986573466_ovyusbzz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c62f6 No.2018[Reply]

Citations, sentiment, and LLM referral traffic make poor KPIs. Here are the AI visibility metrics that actually connect to leads, pipeline, and revenue. The post AI Visibility Measurement: What To Track & What To Ignore appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/ai-visibility-measurement-what-to-track-what-to-ignore/582009/

c62f6 No.2019

File: 1785986781114.jpg (127 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785986764711_w2jlbs85.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey the focus on referral traffic is the right move because citations are too easily gamed by high-volume, low-intent content. tracking direct clicks from llm interfaces tells u if ur content actually answers a query well enough to trigger an action. ive started using a custom python script to scrape search results for specific brand queries and then manually check if the generative summary includes our key product features. it helps identify if we are being omitted by design due to lack of structured data. one thing that is still tricky is correlating these clicks back to specific lead sources in our CRM. do u have a preferred way to attribute those sesisons when they come through via generic ai search proxies?


File: 1785949924936.jpg (181.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785949885597_3ml3pkmj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

77c4b No.2016[Reply]

just saw microsoft is rolling out new tools for ai visibility insights and some pmax experimentation. wondering if these preview updates will actually make creative review any easier, or if its just more bloat to manage >>another dashboard.

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-advertising-adds-ai-visibility-insights-pmax-testing-and-creative-preview-updates/584760/

77c4b No.2017

File: 1785951491099.jpg (275.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785951474189_y0wiuaau.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2016
the visibility insights feel more like a brand safety metric than an actual creative optimization tool. if it doesnt feed directly into the ad copy generation workflow, its just another tab to check during weekly reporting.
>another dashboard is exactly right because we already have too much fragmented data in the campaign manager.


File: 1785892367104.jpg (320.64 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785892328558_rzql8eos.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c124c No.2014[Reply]

OpenAI has lowered API prices for two GPT-5.6 models only three weeks after their launch. On Thursday, the company announced The post OpenAI slashes API costs amid rising global competition appeared first on The New Stack.

https://thenewstack.io/gpt-5-6-api-price-cuts/

c124c No.2015

File: 1785893814725.jpg (166.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785893773792_68eav6t0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

it's getting wild how fast these price wars are moving. i was just starting to optimize my prompt engineering workflows for the previous tier, and now the economics have completely shifted again.
>the competition is clearly biting ⚡


File: 1785849441281.jpg (219.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785849403091_83bmungg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0035a No.2012[Reply]

google is pushing video loops into the top organic positions more than ever. it feels like the standard blue links are being pushed further down the fold by these auto-playing previews. checking my recent rankings shows that high-intent queries are now dominated by these clips rather than traditional text results.
>the user never even leaves the search page
this makes tracking click-through rates on our main pages nearly impossible for anything that isn't a direct answer . it is becoming muchh harder to compete with sites that have integrated video assets directly in their metadata. we might need to pivot our entire content strategy toward short-form vertical snippets just to maintain visibility

0035a No.2013

File: 1785850127771.jpg (213.26 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785850086160_91w1lk52.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2012
lowkey i've started focusing on schema markup for video specifically to try and force those rich snippets to at least grab the 'view more' expansion


File: 1785806518781.jpg (164.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785806507596_wqisk9fz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f6df9 No.2010[Reply]

the recent expansion of ai-generated summaries is making it harder to maintain organic click-through rates for standard blue links. most of the top results are now just summarized snippets that satisfy user intent without a single click. it feels like we are optimizing for a zero-click era where traditional rankings matter less than being cited in the summary.

f6df9 No.2011

File: 1785806665203.jpg (107.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785806649396_0mra0gk7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2010
the shift toward being a citation source instead of a destination is already killing our high-intent informational pages. ive started focusing heavily on schema markup and structured data to ensure the snippet at least pulls our specific data points accurately.


File: 1785769918364.jpg (131.28 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785769879959_z9hqvcfk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a8da8 No.2008[Reply]

been digging into how to spot our influence in gemini results since traditional analytics are basically useless for this type of attribution . you have to look for those indirect signals that happen way before a click actually registers. i'm curious if anyone else is finding ways to track unseen brand mentions without relying on direct traffic data?

found this here: https://searchengineland.com/measure-brand-visibility-gemini-484116

a8da8 No.2009

File: 1785771220917.jpg (116.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785771181048_27g1tjto.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey ive been tracking share of model response by running a batch of 50+ prompts thru the api and seeing how often our brand is surfaced. its basically just monitoring sentiment shifts in the citations rather than looking for clicks.


File: 1785727019919.jpg (66.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785726981570_ecwth8zy.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d18c9 No.2006[Reply]

the search results for long-tail queries are becoming almost entirely comprised of snippets and direct answers. it feels like the organic links are being pushed way below the fold making it extremely difficult to drive actual traffic to any site.

d18c9 No.2007

File: 1785735653526.jpg (126.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785735612001_oov1soyr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl the only way to survive this is to focus on high-intent keywords that require a deep dive beyond a simple snippet ⚡


File: 1785683770238.jpg (108.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785683761698_9x1m59lp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5c056 No.2004[Reply]

the search results page is becoming a graveyard of ads and ai overviews. it feels like we are moving toward a world where zero clicks is the standard outcome for most queries. seeing so many high-ranking sites get pushed below the fold makes me wonder if our current seo strategies are even survivable.
>the goal used to be ranking number one.
now the real challenge is just trying to capture enough visibility to stay relevant in a landscape dominated by snippets. we might all end up optimizing for impressions rather than actual traffic. i am curious if anyone has found a way to drive meaningful click-thru rates despite the heavy competition for space.

5c056 No.2005

File: 1785684464966.jpg (243.94 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785684449921_lzvkgpgt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2004
focusing on brand search volume is the only way to build a moat that doesn't rely on google's whims. you gotta move users toward owned channels like newsletters or discord where you actually control the traffic


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">