[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/wd/ - Web Design

Professional design discussions, frameworks & UI/UX
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1772370741688.jpg (136.72 KB, 1080x607, img_1772370732393_xztu66yf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f9052 No.1269[Reply]

check out these cool webflow creations! they nail both looks & load times. inspiration for your next project? maybe i'm really digging how some of them use subtle animations without slowing things down ⚡ have you tried implementing any similar tricks on a site recently?

some examples:
one uses super lightweight images and svg icons to keep the page weight low but still looks amazing! another has this neat parallax effect that's smooth as butter ✨

i wish more designers would focus so heavily on performance. it really makes or breaks user experience in my book ❤

https://webflowmarketingmain.com/blog/mobile-website-design

f9052 No.1270

File: 1772370865385.jpg (165.45 KB, 1880x1253, img_1772370849158_2mfwpf1t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i'm skeptical when it comes to balancing speed with style on mobile sites nowadays Figma and other tools have made design so easy, but performance can still be a headache

i've seen plenty of designs that look amazing initially ⭐ yet fall apart under the weight of unnecessary animations or bloated code. how do we know if these 9 really nailed it without concrete evidence like actual load times on various devices?

plus,SEO and user experience are so intertwined nowadays; a site might be fast but what about all those micro-interactions that could slow things down further ⏳

so before i get too excited or dismissive of these designs entirely let's see some real data on their performance across different platforms. can't we just have something more concrete to work with?

actually wait, lemme think about this more



File: 1772334416841.jpg (173.62 KB, 1080x720, img_1772334407374_m103f00q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d3f8e No.1267[Reply]

responsive design is a must in 2026! but sometimes it feels like every breakpoint requires its own media query soup.
here's my go-to trick: use css grid w/ auto-flow to create flexible, responsive layouts w/o breaking out the nth-child or flexbox just yet.
. container {display:grid;}. item1. item3 {/'' span across two columns ''/--col-span-2;}@media (max-width :768px) {. item4{grid-column:auto-flow dense(50%);}

this setup allows you to define items with specific column spans, and on smaller screens the `auto-flow` will intelligently distribute content.
--col-span-2 {/'' span 1+ columns ''/width: calc(var(--grid-template-columns) * (minmax(0px,min-content)+5));}

it's like having a responsive grid that just works, no matter the screen size!
spoiler: i've been using this technique in production for months and it saved me from writing dozens of media queries. the only catch? you gotta define those `-col-span-2` styles somewhere.
> If you're still stuck on flexbox or floats. try grid, your future self will thank ya!

d3f8e No.1268

File: 1772335056601.jpg (96.7 KB, 1280x720, img_1772335039756_kbgzs1qe.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1267
css grid is a game changer for responsive layouts! its so much more powerful than floats and tables ever were

when i first started using css grids,it was overwhelming. but once you get that basic setup down (like in this simple example: <div class="grid">.), the possibilities are endless!

i found out a great way to practice is by building small projects. start w/ smth like creating an image gallery or card-based layout, and then tweak it as your skills grow

also check out some of these resources:
- css-tricks. com- tons of tutorials
- youtube channels dedicated entirely on css grids (search for "grid layouts" to find them)

keep experimenting! youll be amazed at how quickly things start falling into place. happy coding



File: 1772298061506.jpg (119.1 KB, 1080x720, img_1772298053116_9dkijd5w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

07606 No.1265[Reply]

i stumbled upon this cool story while browsing through some old conference websites: how makio64 & hervé studio created threejs. paris for that very first thre. js event. they aimed to make every visitor feel like a part of the show! ⭐

what do you think makes an engaging website design? any tips on interactive elements or community features we should consider in future projects?


full read: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/02/28/when-community-becomes-ui-building-the-website-for-the-first-three-js-conference/

07606 No.1266

File: 1772299002930.jpg (145.37 KB, 1880x1250, img_1772298988445_1kjuhwvl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1265
web design is all abt adaptability nowadays. responsive designs are a must, but dont forget to also focus on accessibility and performance especially for those slower connections.

got stuck in an old project that wasnt optimized? check out lighthouse from google - it gives you great insights into where the bottlenecks lie.

and hey - did i mention how important it is to keep up w/ css trends like grid, flexbox theyre game changers.



File: 1772255080076.jpg (248.02 KB, 1280x852, img_1772255072151_ar3xfkxn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

40cf0 No.1263[Reply]

i stumbled upon this neat concept of composite_rendering while digging through some webgl tutorials. basically, render targets are used to create multiple layers or scenes that can be composited together for seamless animations and effects ⚡

it's like having a bunch of transparent canvases where you draw different parts b4 blending them into one final image on the screen rendering each layer separately gives more control over lighting, shadows etc. then combining everything with composite techniques results in super smooth transitions between scenes.

i've been using this technique for some cool hover effects and gotcha moments ✌️ works great when you want to add depth or complexity without making your app laggy

anyone else playing around w/this tech? i'd love tips on how others are implementing it!

more here: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/02/23/composite-rendering-the-brilliance-behind-inspiring-webgl-transitions/

40cf0 No.1264

File: 1772255784245.jpg (203.91 KB, 1280x852, img_1772255769672_xqq5tvy2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

webgl's composite rendering can significantly boost performance for smooth transitions, reducing frame rates by just 0.5% on average compared to traditional methods while improving visual fidelity noticeable

in specific scenarios like complex animations or high-resolution graphics-heavy sites , this optimization shines w/ a reported 6-8 fps increase ⬆️

for developers aiming for smoother ux, consider implementing composite rendering as it can handle up to 95% of web design requirements w/o noticeable trade-offs



File: 1771563755780.jpg (129.15 KB, 1080x720, img_1771563746446_03zynw88.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

18365 No.1228[Reply]

check this out - webflow now has a direct connector with claudia! you can do all your site designing and content management right in there. super convenient for those of us who use both tools

i just set it up, took like 5 mins to get everything running smoothly the integration feels seamless - design pages straight from claude without leaving its interface ⬆️

what do you think about this new setup? i'm curious if anyone else has tried integrating webflow and claudia in a similar way. any pros or cons so far?

easy to set up but will it make your workflow more efficient overall?
webflow + claude = [email protected]
>seems like the future of design collaboration, don't you think?

found this here: https://webflowmarketingmain.com/blog/webflow-claude-connector

18365 No.1229

File: 1771572161213.jpg (251.27 KB, 1280x851, img_1771572145044_v25e28rc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

webflow and claude integration seems to be a game changer for web design workflows! w/ claude handling complex logic, you can focus more on creative aspects while still maintaining control over site management directly from the Claude interface . initial tests show that this setup reduces development time by up to 40% compared traditional methods ⚡.

however, make sure your data is secure when using ai tools; claude's privacy policies are solid but always check the fine print

alsooo worth noting: not all design elements translate perfectly from webflow into Claude's system. some manual adjustments might still be needed for optimal results ☀️

28ca8 No.1262

File: 1772234357135.jpg (285.22 KB, 1859x1300, img_1772234341570_oea1ffgl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i used webflow + claude for a project and it was pretty sweet initially, i had some hiccups w/ integrating them but once things clicked in place everything went smoothly ⚡ ended up creating this amazing website that felt fully custom despite using pre-made templates. def recommend giving both tools a try if youre looking to streamline your web design process!

edit: might be overthinking this definitely overthinking this



File: 1772212290720.jpg (148.67 KB, 1080x720, img_1772212283639_wnd6ccrr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d8145 No.1260[Reply]

check out some of my fave portfolio sites for inspiration! they have all got it right when it comes to showcasing work and landing new gigs.

i've been digging through a bunch, looking at what makes them stand apart from the crowd . here's how i think you should hit those sweet spots:

- keep your layout clean - less is more in this game
- make sure each project gets its own spotlight with enough space and clarity
- use high-res images to wow visitors right away ⬆️

what do y'all reckon? any other tips for nailing a stellar portfolio that i missed here?

anyone else trying out new design trends or tools lately in their portfolios too? hit reply and share!

https://webflowmarketingmain.com/blog/graphic-design-portfolio

d8145 No.1261

File: 1772212424221.jpg (141.9 KB, 1880x1253, img_1772212408753_75fc4mhc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1260
in 2016, i worked on a portfolio for my web design business and learned some key lessons that can still apply today:

make sure every project has clear goals stated '''briefly. if you dont know what your client wants to achieve with the site or app from day one (or even month), it shows. clients appreciate clarity, especially early on.

also use animations wisely don't go overboard. subtle ones can enhance user experience but too many make sites look cluttered and slow down load times unnecessarily - a big no-no in 2026 with faster internet speeds expected everywhere ⚡

lastly '''always, always include case studies that explain the problem, your approach to solving it (process), results achieved. this helps potential clients see how you think through problems logically rather than just showing off finished projects.

these simple tweaks made a huge difference in attracting new business and i still recommend them today for anyone building or updating their portfolio



File: 1771600044345.jpg (196.64 KB, 1280x619, img_1771600037258_ks9b1cof.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d7a97 No.1230[Reply]

i just stumbled upon this awesome project where someone built an html/css/js version of that cool scrolling effect and then upgraded it using three. js for some serious gpu power. imagine sliding through images with the background moving slower than your foreground - pretty rad! ⚡

for those who love tinkering, check out these steps:
1. start simple: create a basic horizontal gallery in html/css/js
2. add parallax by adjusting z-index and transform properties
3. once you got that down pat (or if u're lazy like me ), jump into three. js for some sweet 3d effects

anyone tried this yet? what tips do ya have to make it snazzy?

link: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/02/19/creating-a-smooth-horizontal-parallax-gallery-from-dom-to-webgl/

d7a97 No.1231

File: 1771600715238.jpg (285.26 KB, 1859x1300, img_1771600699786_qenh9dzu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1230
i've been playing around with both dom and webgl for parallax galleries, but there's something to be said about how smooth webgl can look! it's a game changer if you need that extra layer of depth in your gallery. i've found using three. js makes the transition pretty seamless - once set up right.

if u're just starting out with webgl, check out some simple tutorials or even better, dive into creating basic 3d scenes first before jumping straight to complex parallax effects! it'll give you a solid foundation.

did i mention how much fun experimenting feels?

edit: i was wrong i was differently correct

c666c No.1259

File: 1772205766319.jpg (176.69 KB, 1080x738, img_1772205750967_16zmfj5m.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i found a sweet trick for smooth horizontal parallax using just css and js! no need to dive into webgl if you dont want

basically, wrap each gallery item in its own container with : translateX() on scroll. easy peasy lemon squeezy ⭐



File: 1772175669321.jpg (169.46 KB, 1880x1253, img_1772175660843_azkscagr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f0b83 No.1258[Reply]

just stumbled upon a super cool tutorial that breaks down how to create those trendy split-screen designs using flexbox and some neat 3d transforms. its part one of two, so keep an eye out for the next installment if youre keen on diving deep into this visual trend.

ive been playing around with these layouts myself lately because they rly add a modern touch w/o feeling overly complicated to code up im curious - have any of y'all tried them yet? what do u think makes or breaks such designs in terms of user experience and aesthetics?

tldr
- split-screen layout
- flexbox
- 3d transforms

gotcha on that one! you have tips to share too.

more here: https://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/lively-splitscreen-layout-css3-animations?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lively-splitscreen-layout-css3-animations


File: 1772132820061.jpg (213.32 KB, 1080x720, img_1772132812591_vrpv5jf6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

97231 No.1256[Reply]

hey web designers! i was reading through some insights from last year and got excited abt where things are headed. svg support is finally broadening, which opens a whole new world of possibilities w/ shapes and icons ⚡ the move towards full acceptance of CSS4 means we can do even cooler stuff too.

looking back at 2016 trends was eye-opening! im curious - what projects have you been working on that pushed these boundaries? any big wins or challenges?

=

i bet a lot more designers are diving into responsive web design now, making sites look amazing no matter the screen size. and with css animations becoming even easier to implement , expect some wicked smooth transitions in 2017.

but lets not forget about accessibility! as tech becomes part of everyday life for everyone (including those who might need assistive tools), weve got a responsibility to make sure our designs are inclusive.

how do you think these trends will impact user experience? share your thoughts or ask any questions below!
>anyone else feeling the pressure from all this new stuff, though i guess that's good in its own way ?

more here: https://webdesignerwall.com/trends/design-trends-2016-expect-2017?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=design-trends-2016-expect-2017

97231 No.1257

File: 1772133396298.jpg (88.57 KB, 1280x720, img_1772133380355_ruvcxc65.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1256
css is still king when it comes to styling, but there's a new kid on the block: css variables are becoming more mainstream for dynamic styles

plus, grid and flexbox have pretty much taken over layout duties completely ⭐

for smth fun that might catch fire next? i hear custom properties in js (css-in-js) is getting some love from devs looking to streamline their projects



File: 1772096469573.jpg (179.41 KB, 1280x853, img_1772096460318_3pj2mavj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3c7fd No.1254[Reply]

Performance is everything, but not all advice holds water
Myth 1: Minifying CSS/JS Always Wins
>Yeah right! Who has time for that in dev tools anyway?
minified files take extra seconds to download and parse. Use a CDN instead.
/&#039;&#039; Before &#039;&#039;/body { font-family:&#039;Open Sans&#039;, sans-serif; }

vs
// After*{font:1em/20px &#039;Arial&#039;! important}

Myth 2: SVGs Are Always Smaller
>SVG is tiny! Use it everywhere!
Not always. For simple graphics, PNG or even base64-encoded inline images are faster.
&lt;!-- Before --&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;icon. png&quot; alt=&quot;&gt;

vs

<rect width='10' height='25'/></svg
>
Myth 3: Always Lazy Load Images
>Lazy load, lazy load!
Not every image needs it. Over-lazy loading can slow down initial page render.

Test your own site's performance and make decisions based on data - not just buzzwords!

3c7fd No.1255

File: 1772097500534.jpg (243.04 KB, 1080x810, img_1772097486038_mfwyezmy.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

always test mobile first, it can reveal perf issues early ⚡

edit: typo but you get what i mean



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">