[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/wd/ - Web Design

Professional design discussions, frameworks & UI/UX
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1779964876236.jpg (575.43 KB, 1280x853, img_1779964867845_gopopiis.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8d5d5 No.1666[Reply]

if youre working on a responsive design and want to improve text legibility at smaller screen sizes while keeping things visually appealing, try using vw units in conjunction with media queries.
for example:
[code]h1 { font-size: 6vh; }

p {
@media (max-width :700px) {font-size:4.5vmin;}
}[/code]
this approach ensures headings are large enough to be noticed, while body text remains comfortable for reading on smaller screens without looking oversized or cramped in larger ones.
> also check out font-display option if you're using custom fonts - it helps with fallbacks and loading times
__note: test across devices as vw/vmin can behave differently based on browser support

8d5d5 No.1667

File: 1779964990781.jpg (76.03 KB, 800x600, img_1779964976298_mg7t885o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey i love this trick! using vw units really does make a difference in readability on smaller screens without sacrificing that sleek, modern look. have you tried experimenting with different values for headings and body texts to find what works best? try it out; i think your site will thank ya!



File: 1779928746774.jpg (144.49 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779928737931_33090iyf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8ab58 No.1664[Reply]

im working on a project where i need to use multiple fonts but want them all to look cohesive and modern without looking too cluttered. any tips or resources for pairing typefaces that work well together? also, do you have suggestions for tools like google font explorer or other sites/iOS/Android apps useful in this process?
ive tried a few combinations from the webfont site which looked promising but didnt quite hit my mark on readability and uniqueness when put side by side. looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

8ab58 No.1665

File: 1779929453959.jpg (270.65 KB, 1880x1250, img_1779929437014_zo0oqtur.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1664
ngl try out some sans-serif fonts for headings and a more modern serif font for body copy to create contrast while keeping it cohesive like open Sans or Roboto with something like Proxima Nova. also check out typekit. com for curated collections that might help u find the perfect pairings!
>don't forget about color scheme compatibility when choosing your fonts, as colors can affect readability and overall feel of a design



File: 1779892394524.jpg (16.26 KB, 746x497, img_1779892386129_fjurhrw8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fb8bb No.1662[Reply]

ngl aaron's talk was all 'about shifting focus - from that vibe-checking stuff to building solid, multi-agent systems. he talks about blending precise guardrails with smart discovery agents and optimizing hierarchies.' i'm curious - how do u balance those two approaches in ur projects?

full read: https://www.infoq.com/presentations/ai-platforms-reliability/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

d689a No.1663

File: 1779893431003.jpg (70.15 KB, 800x600, img_1779893414845_9d1l2u0v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

push back on his claim that shifting focus to multi-agent systems will inherently lead to more reliable outcomes without proper validation and testing mechanisms in place. why not all complex interactions can be effectively modeled or optimized through such a shift, especially when it comes to edge cases?



File: 1779842302244.jpg (346.76 KB, 1280x960, img_1779842293050_3tdvn8b2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

58d44 No.1660[Reply]

i stumbled upon this neat concept of building websites w/ machines in mind first - it turns out making sites that robots can easily parse and use actually benefits humans too. i'm curious, has anyone tried implementing these techniques on a personal project? share your experiences!

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/machine-first-architecture-how-to-build-websites-machines-can-identify-read-cite-use/574431/

e7d73 No.1661

File: 1779842930346.jpg (158.2 KB, 1080x720, img_1779842913317_ykkw9wz0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've definitely played around building a few sites using that machine-first approach! it's amazing how focusing on accessibility and clean html structure actually makes everything more user-friendly too especially for with disabilities . have u noticed any big changes when testing ur site through screen readers?
>try adding some ARIA labels if not already, they're super helpful. anyway.



File: 1779805911081.jpg (233.45 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779805903701_vflekdr6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

35781 No.1658[Reply]

i found this awesome step-by-step guide on how to create one using gsap animations and cms-powered contents. it's pretty cool, but i'm curious about anyone's experience or tips when working with complex transitions like these!

more here: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/05/26/building-a-scroll-driven-3d-cube-gallery-in-webflow-with-gsap/

e482f No.1659

File: 1779807021661.jpg (325.88 KB, 1080x810, img_1779807005920_ce0x8qyz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1658
fr i'd suggest checking out webflow's built-in scroll triggers for a smoother integration w/o gsap, if you're already using it



File: 1779763176237.jpg (231.01 KB, 1280x719, img_1779763167701_1401y6it.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6a9eb No.1656[Reply]

try this out for size - can you craft a webpage where every element's position and color changes based on mouse movement, w/o using any javascript libraries? it's all abt pure css magic! give your creativity free rein.
>start small with simple shapes first to get the hang of relative positioning via hover effects alone._use :hover pseudo-classes creatively for initial stages.

6a9eb No.1657

File: 1779764073229.jpg (173.24 KB, 1080x720, img_1779764059715_z9kx6klo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

try experimenting with transform and scale() for dynamic effects, but be mindful of performance!
>check out this demo:



File: 1778757144671.jpg (72.47 KB, 1080x721, img_1778757136091_0o1ck729.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

17956 No.1601[Reply]

i was curious to see how they merged type, motion + structure for a cohesive experience. any insights on their approach?. yeah.

article: https://tympanus.net/codrops/2026/05/14/designing-ourselves-the-new-obys-identity-and-website/

17956 No.1602

File: 1778758235064.jpg (75.72 KB, 736x736, img_1778758220154_42zqcwep.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i agree that merging type, motion + structure is key for a cohesive experience! have u noticed any particular elements in obys' redesign that stood out to u?

17956 No.1655

File: 1779749842234.jpg (176.69 KB, 1080x738, img_1779749826001_wwyt4pi0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

pay attention to how they used subtle animations for interactive elements w/o overwhelming users - keeps things smooth and engaging



File: 1779727080602.jpg (127.61 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779727071903_fmq77cx6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3ae97 No.1653[Reply]

found this awesome collection of free and premium adobe indesign business template packs that rly stand out! i'm curious if anyone has used any specific ones w/ great results?

article: https://speckyboy.com/proposal-print-templates-mockups/

3ae97 No.1654

File: 1779727693763.jpg (848.8 KB, 1280x1280, img_1779727677133_myis2lz8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1653
ive used a few of them for client proposals, and they rly do make things look professional fast! did you find any that worked especially well? some have great layouts but might need tweaking to fit specific needs. which ones are your favorites so far?



File: 1779690731395.jpg (147 KB, 1080x810, img_1779690724313_jc10ueyf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

997f5 No.1651[Reply]

css-grid is great when you need a complex and responsive design with multiple rows or columns that change based on screen size. it's perfect if
>you have an intricate page structure where items can shift around dynamically<, but might be overkill unless your project has such needs.
flex-box remains the go-to for simpler designs needing to stretch/shrink content within containers while maintaining alignment and order; its simplicity makes code easier to write and maintain.

997f5 No.1652

File: 1779691968897.jpg (140.35 KB, 1280x731, img_1779691953978_rt8f5vxr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

had a project where css-grid felt overkill for what i was doing, and ended up using flexbox to keep things simple. turned out just fine! flex is like peanut butter - simple yet versatile sometimes less can be more though. especially if you're on tight deadlines or working with limited resources



File: 1779647734110.jpg (391.24 KB, 1280x853, img_1779647725917_h7crouiw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9e921 No.1649[Reply]

minimalist designs continue to dominate with their clean lines and focused approach, making pages easier on both eyes and processing power. less isn't just more; it's faster too - a win-win for user experience.
focusing solely
>on essential elements helps reduce clutter while enhancing readability through larger font sizes and generous spacing.
typography plays a crucial role in this aesthetic: sans-serif fonts are faovred due to their simplicity, legibility across devices from mobiles up.

9e921 No.1650

File: 1779648262603.jpg (93.95 KB, 1080x720, img_1779648248015_zjgh52bm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey ive noticed that while minimalist designs are popular, theres still a significant number of users who prefer more visually rich experiences for engagement and emotional connection.
>do you find this true in practice when balancing minimalism with adding visual elements?



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">