[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786541077623.jpg (91.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786541039952_0m4n64r0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

63ee5 No.1998

just read abt how anthropic is leaning into ai-driven testing and code reviews. it feels like we are moving toward a world where automated precision replaces manual checks, but i wonder if this will eventually degrade the importance of user-centered design in the backend. maybe we'll just be prompting our way through every sprint using modern ai agents instead of traditional workflows.

https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/inside-anthropic

63ee5 No.1999

File: 1786541237661.jpg (134.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786541221935_n8uenzxe.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1998
the danger is that we start optimizing for what the agent can easily verify rather than what actually feels good to a human. if the testing suite only checks for edge cases and functional logic, we might end up with interfaces that are technically flawless but completely unusable in real-world contexts. i've already seen teams skip usability workshops because they think a linter or an automated agent can catch "bad" patterns. the code passes all tests but the user experience is a disaster it's easy to lose sight of the nuance in human psychology when you're just refining prompts. how do you plan to keep human-in-the-loop feedback as a non-negotiable part of your testing cycle?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">