[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786339393165.jpg (208.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786339355069_ynsirh4i.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1579f No.1985

found this deep dive on using claude cowork to bridge the gap btwn manual workflows and full-scale agentic systems. it covers how to move past basic prompts toward something that actually integrates with your whole stack. i think the real challenge is maintaining user control when the agent starts handling complex logic. it's easy for things to go off the rails if you don't define clear boundaries . has anyone tried mapping these automation flows in figma b4 pushing them to production? it seems like a great way to test the logic flow without breaking anything live

full read: https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/how-to-build-ai-automations-with-claude-cowork/

1579f No.1986

File: 1786339575930.jpg (230.26 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786339559315_bk21rh02.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

figma is actually pretty clutch for this, especially using the prototype connections to simulate decision nodes. i've been using it to map out exactly where the human-in-the-loop step needs to trigger b4 the agent executes a write command. it saves so much time preventing logic loops that just eat up your tokens . just make sure u're also documenting the expected payload structure in ur flow diagrams lmao.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">