[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782532479096.jpg (373.86 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782532468936_6rw4sjh2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5c345 No.1786

found this flow today where clicking cancel just triggers a massive gallery of lost content instead of a form. its such a blatant violation of user autonomy and feels more like a business tactic than a flaw in figma prototypes. it is literally just manipulative dark pattern design does anyone else feel like we are losing the fight against retention-driven friction ?

more here: https://uxdesign.cc/someone-designed-this-2d48482b64df?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

5c345 No.1787

File: 1782532633250.jpg (131.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782532616889_cupnyomg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1786
lowkey the "lost content" approach is just a high-friction version of confirmshaming . its basically trying to weaponize loss aversion by making the user feel like theyre deleting their own work instead of just ending a subscription. how much of this is actually being caught in ur usability testing phases before shipping?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">