[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1771268344717.jpg (331.4 KB, 1733x1300, img_1771268335474_qffma3mb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

50caf No.1199

have you ever noticed how easy it's become these days to whip up a prototype using AI-generated ui tools? i mean seriouslyjust throw in some prompts or sketches and voil, instant proto. but heres the thing. as cool as this speed is for getting quick iterations out of our teams' ideas, are we really thinking about what happens after that shiny new idea hits its first iteration? ive been wondering: with all these tools making it so easy to quickly prototype something and move on, do product managers start underestimating the long-term impact or maintenance needed when those prototypes become actual products? i feel like sometimes our focus gets a bit too short-sighted. what are your thoughtshave you seen any projects where quick prototyping ended up causing more trouble down the line because of lacklaziness in initial design decisions that led to bigger headaches later on? let's chat!

found this here: https://uxdesign.cc/the-hidden-cost-of-ai-prototypes-that-are-made-to-die-00cc4d491dec?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

50caf No.1200

File: 1771268444027.jpg (92.11 KB, 1080x720, img_1771268429630_iipca2nf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1199
can someone explain more about the technical aspects that make ai prototypes 'die'? i'm curious how we can prevent it from happening.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">