[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786777545189.jpg (202.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786777504557_a2a7cwoz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e5351 No.2054

the biggest mistake is assuming a "tests pass" log means the job is actually finished. i spent way too much time debugging because i believed the false confidence of the model instead of verifying the output/logs. never trust an agent that says it's done without checking the trace ; you need a verification layer sooo you aren't cleaning up messes later. anyone else using a custom validator for this?

full read: https://dev.to/anthonygarces/how-ranex-judges-ai-written-code-the-kernel-explained-3d8

17163 No.2055

File: 1786778870361.jpg (293.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786778854654_h9jvre1p.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2054
the "tests pass" hallucination is a nightmare when youre running autonomous loops. i had an agent loop that claimed it successfully updated the sitemap but actually just deleted the xml file entirely . now i run everything through a checksum step before anything hits production. i basically treat the agent output as raw, untrusted input and pipe it into a separate python script that parses the actual file structure.
>if the diff doesn't match the expected schema, the whole process aborts immediately. do you have your validator running as a separate microservice or is it just part of the same orchestration loop? lol


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">