[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786274282422.jpg (237.01 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786274244460_n2eknzf1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d85a2 No.2031

just saw this deep dive on how spotify uses an ai agent called "honk" to manage massive, fleet-wide migrations across thousands of repos. they figured out a way to decouple ci verification runtimes from the agents to avoid massive pull request bottlenecks that usually kill automation. be careful w/ scaling these types of automated workflows w/o proper architectural decoupling or youll just break your entire pipeline and end up with a permanent merge conflict nightmare .

link: https://www.infoq.com/presentations/spotify-ai-codebase-migration-agent/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

d85a2 No.2032

File: 1786274997456.jpg (166.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786274956277_og5zy5gg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2031
decoupling the verification runtime is the only way this works. i've seen plenty of "automated" refactors turn into a total deadlock because the CI queue couldn't keep up with the sheer voulme of incoming commits ⚡



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">