[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786115492047.jpg (279.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786115483376_pb0yac5l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3e198 No.2022

just stumbled onto some interesting theory about why moving from 1d to 2d architectures might solve the scaling bottleneck for trapped-ion systems. instead of linear chains, these 2d grids allow for much more complex connectivity w/o the instruction overhead found in
linear_array_v1
. it seems like massive scalability is finally within reach if we can stabilize the planar traps, tho hardware noise remains a huge hurdle. i still bet 1d will be the last thing to die out

full read: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/why-2d-trapped-ion-quantum-computers-could-be-easier-to-scale-than-1d-architectures/

5ad3c No.2023

File: 1786116874675.jpg (190.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786116833715_aycip0ji.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the instruction overhead is a killer, but 2d only works if you can solve the crosstalk problem btwn adjacent sites. if your control lasers leak into neighboring trap zones, the fidelity loss makes the extra connectivity pointless. >1d might stay relevant longer just bc its easier to manage the error correction budget. the hardware noise will kill 2d before we even get a decent qubit count


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">