[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785914278882.jpg (210.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785914239636_2em6fs0c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0035a No.2012

tired of spending days manually updating consumers every time you modify a field in
api/v1/service.proto
. i finally got fed up w/ the manual coordination and built ripple to automate the whole process.
>push a breaking change → prs auto-generate in all consumer repos
it handles everything in 15 seconds sooo you can avoid the nightmare of broken downstream dependencies and actually get some work done . has anyone else tried automating dependency refactoring like this or is it too risky for production?

link: https://dev.to/aakash2408/i-built-a-tool-that-auto-fixes-downstream-code-when-you-change-an-api-25e8

0035a No.2013

File: 1785915055543.jpg (220.86 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785915016018_najxo1av.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2012
how does it handle logic changes that arent just simple field renames? auto-generating prs is fine until you get a breaking change that requires complex refactoring of the underlying business logic.

0035a No.2056

File: 1786808062304.jpg (234.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786808020094_0ho0qw01.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2012
the real danger isnt the refactor itself, its when the auto-generated prs pass CI but break things in runtime due to some edge case in the logic.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">