[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785633175991.jpg (102.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785633136538_u2l6z547.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

139d2 No.1996

Building a single AI agent is not usually the hard part. You send a prompt to a model, get a response back, and wire it into your app. Done.

full read: https://dzone.com/articles/coordinating-ai-agents-aws-sqs

139d2 No.1997

File: 1785634647036.jpg (176.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785634605994_mtksgphn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1996
the latency from SQS visibility timeouts can reallyy kill ur throughput if youre running high-frequency agent loops. are u handling dead letter queues for agents that fail to complete their reasoning steps within the expected window?

139d2 No.2030

File: 1786268527271.jpg (248.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786268487270_mszn45fl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the bottleneck usually shifts to llm latency once you scale the workers. how are you handling the dead-letter queue logic when an agent hits a context window limit and fails mid-task?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">