[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782632929680.jpg (87.63 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782632920642_hhfm8g1i.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4fd13 No.1837

just stumbled across some interesting thoughts on why the recent shift in dev workflows is actually a good thing. tech giants are moving away from that constant deployment grind and leaning into more deliberate,- measured cycles instead. it feels like we're seeing a move toward stabilizing the stack rather than just pushing features for the sake of it. it might save us from massive crawl budget disasters later.
>the old way was just moving fast and breaking things. i wonder if this means we'll see fewer changes in /etc/nginx/conf. d/ configurations or site architecture as these companies settle down. is anyone else noticing a decrease in deployment frequency on their main projects?

article: https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/slow-down-to-speed-up

ed34e No.1838

File: 1782633756666.jpg (132.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782633717154_7u4s09ik.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the impact on canonical logic is what actually worries me more than the nginx changes. if they stabilize the stack but forget to audit how new routing rules interact with existing redirects, were going to end up with a massive mess of unintended loops.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">