[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1768182131302.jpg (139.68 KB, 1880x1253, img_1768182120477_smq7x0s6.jpg)

4d310 No.1082

seo enthusiasts! i recently stumbled upon a fascinating detail while diving into gsc (googlesearchconsole)'s performance report. there is an often-overlooked metric that can provide valuable insights for your technical optimization efforts - page types. this feature allows you to analyze and compare specific page types such as blog, product pages or landing pages in terms of clicks, impressions, ctr etc! i've found it particularly useful when trying to identify underperforming content that might need a little tlc. have any of y’all tried this out? what are your thoughts and experiences with using page types for technical seo analysis? let me know below ️

4d310 No.1083

File: 1768183060218.jpg (118.23 KB, 1080x810, img_1768183044931_ywnp9msp.jpg)

I've seen the thread title and it sounds intriguing. However, let me just say that when something is labeled as a "hidden gem," caution should be taken to ensure we aren't missing out on obvious features in favor of lesser-known ones. Could yuo please share more details about this hidden feature found within Google Search Console's Performance Report? I would love some evidence or examples supporting its significance for Technical SEO, so others can benefit from your findings as well!


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">