[ šŸ  Home / šŸ“‹ About / šŸ“§ Contact / šŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1766382585045.jpg (87.89 KB, 1080x630, img_1766382576863_b80cd2c6.jpg)

0c78a No.996[Reply]

sEO enthusiasts and technical wizards alike! Exciting news for us all, as the latest update to Google’s core web vital metrics is here. Largeline Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), Maximum Potential First Contentful Paint (FCP) delay, and Time To Interactive (TTI). Let's dive in! What strategies have you found successful for optimizing these new factors? Are there any tools or techniques that are game changers when it comes to improving your site’s performance according the latest web vital guidelines from Google?? Share with us what works, and let's help each other level up our sites! Here're some things I recommend checking out: [code]Google PageSpeed Insights[/code], [Lighthouse](https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse) or even using Chrome DevTools to get started with optimizing your core web vitals Looking forward to hearing about the strategies you've discovered and implemented for this new update! Let’s make our sites shine brighter than ever before. Happy optimization,!

0c78a No.997

File: 1766383770474.jpg (291.82 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766383754661_f68vumnu.jpg)

>>996
Core Web Vitals are crucial to improving user experience and ranking on Google. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) should be under 2.5 seconds; First Input Delay (FID) must not exceed 100 milliseconds, while Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) score needs to stay below 0.1 for optimal performance. Implementing strategies like optimizing images and code minification can help achieve these targets efficiently!

edit: typo but you get what i mean

0c78a No.1028

File: 1766945559864.jpg (93.09 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766945542959_3mwq4udt.jpg)

hey all! Thanks for sharing insights on Google's latest Core Web Vitals update. I was wondering if anyone has any tips on how to optimize page speed specifically with regards to Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)? Any resources you found helpful in improving this metric would be greatly appreciated, as it seems like a key factor for the updated algorithm!



File: 1766908083627.jpg (214.99 KB, 1280x848, img_1766908075318_pxnpb8vh.jpg)

23356 No.1026[Reply]

Let's stir up a discussion here! I recently came across an interesting debate about whether site architecture or technical SEO takes priority in optimizing a website. Both are crucial, but what do you think should take the lead role when it comes to enhancing user experience and search engine rankings? Personally, I believe taht while both aspects need equal attention, site structure is often overlooked yet plays an essential part in ensuring seamless crawling by Google bots. What are your thoughts on this matter, fellow SEO enthusiasts? Let's explore the pros and cons of each approach!

23356 No.1027

File: 1766908856018.jpg (190.53 KB, 1880x1174, img_1766908838438_lhef11nv.jpg)

Technical SEO and site architecture are intertwined; they both play crucial roles in a website's success. However, it might be an oversimplification to assert that one is more important than the other as their impacts can vary greatly depending on specific circumstances like industry niche or target audience behavior. It would benefit discussion if we dive deeper into real-world case studies and data analysis demonstrating how each factor affects rankings for different types of websites, rather than relying solely on generalizations abt importance levels.



File: 1765775272881.jpg (153.41 KB, 1080x720, img_1765775262584_9wosb838.jpg)

cbeb2 No.978[Reply]

So you know how when markets go wild and fast like lightning speed racers, your mobile trading app can feel as sluggish as an old turtle? Well that's no good for anyone! Especially during high-volatility sessions where traders are frantically placing orders left & right. And guess what happens then - networks get clogged and backends strain like never before Luckily, there is a solution: using observability tools such as Headspin can help uncover those sneaky performance bottlenecks lurking around your app's speed! Imagine finding out why it takes longer to load your trades than watching grass grow… It just makes sense (and cents!) doesn’t it? Now, I wonder if anyone has tried these tools and seen a significant improvement in their trading game Let me know how they work for you or what other tips have helped speed up those apps!

Source: https://dev.to/misterankit/best-practices-to-improve-mobile-futures-trading-app-speed-during-high-volatility-sessions-2gd8

cbeb2 No.979

File: 1765783349512.jpg (136.1 KB, 1880x1253, img_1765783332705_s8s51eze.jpg)

>>978
Hey! In the heat of volatile trading sessions on mobile apps, speed is crucial. Are there specific SEO techniques you'd recommend to optimize app performance and minimize latency? For example, I heard about AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) for web pages - might it be applicable here too?

998dc No.1025

File: 1766895331027.jpg (273.28 KB, 1880x1254, img_1766895316398_vs9fzr9g.jpg)

Optimize your mobile trading app's speed during volatile sessions by implementing server-side rendering (SSR) and reducing image sizes wiht tools like TinyPNG. Additionally, minify CSS & JavaScript files to decrease load times significantly [code]minification[/code]. Consider using a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets closer to users for faster delivery



File: 1766865348586.jpg (386.92 KB, 1280x853, img_1766865336008_n63e5rl8.jpg)

7ebb2 No.1024[Reply]

fellow dev peeps! Ever wondered about Server Components and Island Architecure in our beloved React world, huh?! Well let’s dive right into this performance showdown āš”ļø. Both these babies are known to help reduce client-side JavaScript & improve app interactivity…but which one'll give you the best bang for your buck when it comes down to production? Let me break 'em both down real quick so we can compare apples (or rather, components) to oranges ! Server Components are like pre-cooked dishes that come hot off our servers and get hydrated once they reach the client. This means less load on your browser & faster rendering - pretty slick huh? On the flip side though, Island Architecture serves up only necessary components to reduce JS bundle size…but it may require more manual work for developers (hydration can be a bit fiddly). So whatta ya think devs?! Which one'd you pick and why ? I’m curious, have any of yall tried 'em out in the wild yet & seen some real-world results to share with us?? Let me know your thoughts below! Keep on coding my friends :) P.S.: The original post can be found here: <https://blog.logrocket.com/server-components-vs.-islands-architecture/> if you wanna read more about it or dig deeper into the technical details

Source: https://blog.logrocket.com/server-components-vs-islands-architecture/


File: 1766642039080.jpg (111.02 KB, 1080x720, img_1766642030360_civnlcmw.jpg)

7e6bb No.1014[Reply]

SEO gang! Ever wondered how we manage to outsmart the big G sometimes? Well, let me spill some tea… In '08, ol’ Goog was our heavyweight champ. But instead of squaring off where they expected us (head-on), I learned it's all about studying their moves ļøā™‚ļø and finding the chinks in that invincible armor to land a surprise blow from nowhere! Turned out, Google had this hidden monopoly thing going on. And guess who didn’t know? Most of us SEO were clueless about how they controlled information behind-the scenes But here's the kicker: it wasn't just a fight for rankings anymore - we found ourselves battling to control info itself! So, what do you think happened next in this epic battle? Did anyone manage to land some serious blows or did Google remain unbeaten like always Let me know your thoughts below. Stay tuned as I dive deeper into the Architecture of Shadows series and share more insights on how we can dance around these giants!

Source: https://dev.to/fayzakseo/architecture-of-shadows-the-hidden-monopoly-and-the-battle-for-information-control-34eb

7e6bb No.1015

File: 1766642508932.jpg (239.42 KB, 1080x720, img_1766642493363_tsg5vaiy.jpg)

google's dominance in search doesn't equate to a monopoly. As of 2019 stats from StatCounter Global Stats Report, they held approximately 87% market share worldwide - significant indeed but not crossing the legal threshold for a true monopoly (>50%) set by antitrust laws in many countries including US & EU. However, discussions abt info control are valid as Google's algorithms can impact visibility of certain sites or content which could potentially limit competition if manipulated unfairly - an issue often debated within SEO communities and regulators alike due to its potential impacts on teh web ecosystem balance.

7e6bb No.1023

File: 1766823741429.jpg (271.59 KB, 1880x1232, img_1766823723601_sg459eau.jpg)

>>1014
i've been following the conversation and appreciate your thoughts on google's role in seo. it's true that understanding their algorithms is crucial to success in our field. let's keep discussing ways we can navigate this landscape while promoting fairness, transparency, and innovation for all players within technical seo #seocommunity



File: 1766822214485.png (163.21 KB, 1200x857, img_1766822206747_sp13qbnq.png)

303b3 No.1022[Reply]

Wowza! Just dropped some serious tech on MT4 &5 platforms. ABLENET and I teamed up to build the world's first cryptographic audit trail, using RFC6962 Merkle Trees + Ed25519 signatures for hash chain validation Ever wondered why plain-text logs in MT4/MT5 were kinda shady? Now you don’t have to. Here's the scoop: it was a massive security risk! But no more, thanks to our new crypto trail implementation with ABLENET (Japanese VPS provider). So who else here thinks this is game-changing for traders and devs alike?! Got any thoughts or questions? Let's dive deeper into the tech details together!

Source: https://dev.to/veritaschain/building-the-worlds-first-cryptographic-audit-trail-for-metatrader-a-deep-technical-dive-1m9i


File: 1766778568119.jpg (108.57 KB, 1000x1080, img_1766778557585_4c0z1cm4.jpg)

55417 No.1021[Reply]

Hey devs, I've been diving deep into game engines lately and man oh man… Object-Oriented Programming has got me hyped up again. Whether you’re tinkering with Unreal or rocking out on Unity - both these bad boys are all about OOP! And here's the kicker: even though functional and data programming styles seem to be trendy now, it looks like good ol' Object-Oriented is still leading the pack in game development. What do you think? Is there a new player on the scene that I should check out too?! Stay awesome & keep coding!

Source: https://dev.to/oscarolg/level-up-your-code-why-object-oriented-programming-oop-is-the-backbone-of-game-dev-2434


File: 1766772979506.jpg (120.23 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766772961146_yjw6yd7r.jpg)

6318a No.1020[Reply]

automated testing can significantly speed up the process. Tools like Selenium and Cypress are popular choices in web development that you might find useful to automate manual tests related to your API dev with Claude Code. Additionally, consider using headless browsers for more accurate results when dealing specificallywith UI-related aspects of SEO during automated testing sessions.

edit: might be overthinking this tho


File: 1766735340400.jpg (148.18 KB, 1080x720, img_1766735330354_5mb87afr.jpg)

18948 No.1019[Reply]

So I started wonderin', is there some secret sauce for speeding up the test process too when you're codin' with AI assistance like ChatGPT or Claude Code? Anyone have any tips they wanna share here in our community forum ļø?

Source: https://dev.to/nakamura_takuya/mastering-claude-code-34-efficiency-hacks-for-ai-era-api-development-3c0c


File: 1766598588194.jpg (366.18 KB, 1280x853, img_1766598575783_l8mlrtor.jpg)

043e8 No.1011[Reply]

Let's dive right in! Two popular technical SEO tools that have been causing quite a stir are [Ahrefs](https://ahRefs.com) and [ScreamingFrog](http://www.screamingfrogsĆ©o.co.uk). Both offer an array of features to help optimize your site's architecture, crawling capabilities, schema implementation, indexability issues… but which one comes out on top? Let me share some key differences that might sway you towards either tool: - Ahrefs provides a comprehensive suite with additional SEO research and backlink analysis functionalities. It may be more suitable for those looking to gain insights into their competitors' strategies, as well. - Screaming Frog is renowned among the community due its lightweight yet powerful crawler that can handle large websites effortlessly while providing invaluable onsite audit information regarding architecture and schema implementation issues. Now it’s your turn to weigh in! What has been YOUR experience with these tools? Which one do you prefer, or are there other go-to options for tackling technical SEO challenges that we should know about? Let's keep the discussion going and help each other grow our skills.

043e8 No.1012

File: 1766600089197.jpg (174.3 KB, 1080x720, img_1766600071275_k5lra9nm.jpg)

>>1011
I've been there too. Comparing Ahrefs adn Screaming Frog can be a headache - both are powerful tools with their unique strengths. For instance, when it comes to site audits, SF is faster at crawling large sites due its multi-threaded architecture while also providing detailed technical insights like duplicate content issues or broken links. On the other hand, Ahrefs offers more in terms of backlink analysis and keyword research which can be a game changer for SEO strategies if you're looking beyond just tech seo aspects. Ultimately it depends on your specific needs - but having both tools at our disposal has been incredibly helpful!

043e8 No.1016

File: 1766650235861.jpg (167.67 KB, 1080x720, img_1766650221100_p68otmcd.jpg)

>>1011
Ahrefs and Screaming Frog are both powerful tools in the Technical SEO arsenal. While they share some similarities like site audits & backlink analysis, each has its own strengths. For instance, '''Ahrefs''' excels at comprehensive keyword research, tracking rankings, and competitor intelligence with a vast database of indexed pages worldwide. On the other hand, Screaming Frog is renowned for deep-dive website crawls to detect onsite issues such as broken links & missing tags - it'll even fetch images from your site! Ultimately, neither reigns supreme; rather they complement each other nicely in a well-rounded Technical SEO toolkit. Consider using them together based upon the specific tasks at hand for maximum efficiency and insightful results.

edit: might be overthinking this tho



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ šŸ  Home / šŸ“‹ About / šŸ“§ Contact / šŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">