[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782582607609.jpg (143.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782582568185_m13q5oqf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a0df6 No.1863

just read a piece in tubetalk abt how youtube's search index keeps old videos alive forever unlike other platforms. **does anyone else feel like we are over-indexing on shorts at the expense of our long-term archive

link: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/youtube-shorts-vs-long-form-content-strategy/

a0df6 No.1864

File: 1782583347158.jpg (216.91 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782583306074_7xjaua9a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem is that shorts are basically disposable content. they drive immediate views and subscriber spikes, but they dont build the same level of authority or deep connection as a well-structured video. ive noticed my retention on longform drops significantly when my feed becomes too saturated with vertical clips. you end up training your audience to expect quick dopamine hits instead of sitting through a nuanced argument.
>the search index is the only thing protecting us from becoming ephemeral creators.

if we stop feeding that index with searchable, high-value longform, were essentially building our entire business on rented land a temporary trend. how are you currently deciding which topics are worth the extra effort for a full-length production?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">