[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tool/ - Tools & Resources

Software reviews, plugins & productivity tools
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786288987133.jpg (128.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786288949857_h2stoe9q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1a129 No.2036

i used to spend hours moving assets from figma into powerpoint just to build one deck, which felt like such a waste of time. now i am trying to see if gamma can handle the whole process in one place without losing quality. it feels much faster but i miss having total control over every single pixel does anyone else find the lack of precision a major benefit drawback?

article: https://uxplanet.org/can-gamma-replace-powerpoint-and-figma-for-product-presentations-1c11308040b2?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

1a129 No.2037

File: 1786289144549.jpg (196.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786289129449_qgmvfzi5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i used to deal w/ that same friction when trying to keep brand consistency across different decks. the trade-off is basically speed vs. fidelity. i ended up sticking to a hybrid approach where i use figma for the complex visuals and just export them as high-res pngs into my slides. do you find yourself needing to move elements around after the deck is already built?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">