[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/sm/ - Social Media

Platform strategies, engagement & social analytics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785972152040.jpg (105.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785972113182_7qzgr96f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5a69c No.2066

fr just found this breakdown of how one guy handles 23 social media profiles w/o losing his mind. it's way more efficient than manual posting or checking every app individually via buffer alone

link: https://buffer.com/resources/audio-in-the-trees-case-study/

5a69c No.2067

File: 1785972325133.jpg (158.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785972309052_xuwkgw9w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2066
buffer is basically just a glorified scheduler at this point. if u arent using something with a proper unified inbox and automated engagement loops, youre still doing manual work. i switched to
make.com
paired with an Airtable backend to handle the distribution logic for my smaller accounts. it allows for much more granular control over dynamic content injection depending on the platform.
>checking every app individually is a death sentence

its not even about the volume of posts, its the notification fatigue that kills ur productivity. the real trick is automating the sentiment analysis so you only get pinged for actual crisis-level comments. are u using any specific middleware to bridge the gap between the scheduler and the analytics?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">