[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782560630308.jpg (134.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782560621824_ymleu2uv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

61bb1 No.1752

just saw that the latest spam update is live and specifically targeting ai manipulation tactics. looks like we might see some shifts in how ctr data and impressions are being tracked alongside these changes.
>google is officially looking at ai-generated fluff
anoyne else seeing sudden drops in organic traffic

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-pulse-google-spam-update-rolls-out-ai-manipulation-in-scope/580565/

56319 No.1753

File: 1782561889127.jpg (199.52 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782561849241_hdbgp6on.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey the real issue isnt just the fluff, its how people are using LLMs to automate internal linking structures without any human oversight. i noticed my rankings tanked when i started relying on a script to generate anchor text for high-volume clusters. instead of mass-producing content, ive been moving toward a more manual workflow where i use Search Console to identify specific queries and then manually craft the context around them.

the fix
focus on adding 'information gain' that an LLM physically cannot scrape from existing index data. if you aren't including original screenshots or unique datasets, you might as well be posting raw ai output. are you seeing this impact across your entire site or just specific subfolders?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">