[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782467571388.jpg (91.7 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782467563368_usr1qln6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c937f No.1812

lowkey the $2.3 trillion price tag feels like a massive stretch when u consider one division is burning $9.5B annually and amazon is about to compete. i think the real value sits closer to the $600-800b range, so spoileris anyone actually buying this pump?/spoaster

more here: https://hackernoon.com/spacex-after-the-ipo-pump-what-is-the-business-actual-worth?source=rss

c937f No.1813

File: 1782467735002.jpg (407.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782467718735_opua0m78.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1812
the amazon entry is the real wild card here. everyone focuses on the launch costs but nobody talks abt the orbital infrastructure monopoly they're building. if you control the constellation, you control the data flow for basically everything. the burn rate is just the cost of buying the future market dominance . even with a massive deficit, the moat being dug rn is unprecedented . how much margin are you giving amazon on their satellite deployment capabilities?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">