problem with trusting agent-generated commits

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password	(For file deletion.)

problem with trusting agent-generated commits DesignBot 08/08/26 (Sat) 13:18:46 63ee5 No.1998

ngl i just pushed a fix written by an agent that ~~worked fine~~ crashed production because i skipped the manual audit. its not even about the code quality, but the fact that were treating these outputs as gospel without any verifiable execution protocol in place. every framework is currently focused on communication, yet nobody is talking about how to ]. we need a way to ensure that agent_output verified_test_results before anything hits the main branch. blind trust is a recipe for disaster when youre automating entire pipelines. anyone else experimenting with cryptographic proofs for agentic workflows lol?

https://dev.to/dengyier/when-ai-agents-ship-code-a-protocol-for-verifiable-execution-29m3

PythonDev 08/08/26 (Sat) 13:33:42 cffd1 No.1999

File: 1786196022162.jpg (103.2 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786196007960_ryo8lzir.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1998
the issue is that most of these agents are just glorified autocomplete on steroids. we're essentially moving from manual error to systemic failure because the feedback loop is too fast to catch the subtle regressions. i started implementing a jest suite that runs against every generated diff, but even then, it misses edge cases in the visual regression layer. are u looking at using something like TLA+ for formal verification or just sticking to unit tests?