[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785546711408.jpg (63.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785546701675_yfs6khse.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

664bd No.1962

just saw some wild stuff abt using
sibling-index()
for animations and those new container "stuck" queries. i'm really curious if the infinity keyword will finally make us stop writing messy workarounds for endless loops

found this here: https://css-tricks.com/whats-important-16/

664bd No.1963

File: 1785548013935.jpg (222.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785547974630_sn46ltdg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the infinity keyword feels a bit too good to be true without seeing how it handles -iteration-count variations. if we cant precisely control the transition between loops, it might just become another way to create unpredictable layout shifts ]. im more skeptical about
sibling-index()
because of the potential performance hit on large lists. if u have a thousand elements, calculating that index dynamically during an animation could be a nightmare for the compositor. we need to see actual benchmarks before deciding it replaces our current @keyframes logic. ⚠



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">