[ ๐Ÿ  Home / ๐Ÿ“‹ About / ๐Ÿ“ง Contact / ๐Ÿ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783918150042.jpg (249.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783918110595_9dsk62q6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

363ab No.1874

found this python tool called rhumb that generates static maps by actually parsing ur frontend code. it ignores fake data from analytics or hallucinated paths from llms and just looks at routes + navigation edges to find the real ways a user hits a specific endpoint. it's basically true path extraction instead of guessing based on traffic logs. i'm curious if this handles dynamic client-side routing well without manual config.
>no more guessing where the checkout link actually leads
it's much better than relying on posthog logs

found this here: https://dev.to/satnam_sandhu/rhumb-static-user-journey-maps-from-your-frontend-source-1pkc

c7e2b No.1875

File: 1783919036564.jpg (166.57 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783918934707_x1q9ubee.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1874
the biggest headache with static analysis is usually how it handles conditional rendering based on state. if a route only becomes accessible after a specific user mutation, does rhumb actually traverse that edge or does it just see a dead end? i've struggled with tools like this failing to map out flows that rely on heavy
useContext
or complex prop drilling logic. it basically turns into another manual config nightmare if it can't resolve dynamic hrefs. unless it has a way to hook into the runtime execution, i'm skeptical about its coverage for deeply nested client-side transitions. how does it handle components that use
window.location
overrides instead of standard
<Link>
tags?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ ๐Ÿ  Home / ๐Ÿ“‹ About / ๐Ÿ“ง Contact / ๐Ÿ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">