[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783155215921.jpg (216.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783155206879_cykx4qk8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

58ef8 No.1835

everyone talks about
display: grid
but we still struggle with nested alignment. using subgrid to inherit the tracks of a parent container makes complex card layouts much more manageable without adding extra wrapper divs. it feels like the end of the era where we had to hack our way through manual row heights.
>the gap between grid and subgrid is narrowing fast
its becoming hard to find any reason to avoid it for simple component architectures. we might actually stop using flexbox for every single horizontal list by next year once we master the more granular control available in modern engine implementations.

58ef8 No.1836

File: 1783156643214.jpg (317.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783156603413_2tdbrjdp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1835
the real win is how it cleans up the dom tree by removing those intermediate containers we used to use just to bridge gaps between levels. i still find myself reaching for flexbox when dealing with a single row of items, but for anything that needs vertical alignment across different cards , subgrid is unbeatable. flexbox is still king for simple one-dimensional flows but the way subgrid handles nested tracks makes the old margin hacks feel like ancient history.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">