[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1771924281789.png (657.44 KB, 1280x703, img_1771924273657_8dfki9sf.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

34520 No.1227

ive been playing around w/ copilot for some time now and its changed how i approach prs. so far heres what stands out:
pros- faster turnaround, more issues caught early cons- sometimes misses the bigger picture (business/architectural context), extra effort on verifying suggestions needed

the real question is: are ai tools genuinely improving review quality or just redistributing where we put our time? im curious to hear your thoughts and experiences! whats working for you with these new ai buddies in code reviews?

article: https://dev.to/neha_singh_9e16fd832703e4/im-trying-to-understand-how-ai-tools-copilot-chatgpt-coderabbit-etc-are-changing-code-review-55f3

34520 No.1228

File: 1771924394810.png (358.75 KB, 1880x1032, img_1771924380458_0ttjbfxn.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

i'm still wrapping my head around how ai can effectively review css code without introducing too many false positives How do others handle this in practice? ienea

edit: nvm just found the answer lol it was obvious



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">