[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786065140390.jpg (142.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786065100460_yrpdy3es.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6b76b No.1991

been weighing up my options for session replays lately. microsoft clarity is a really solid free choice if u just need basic heatmaps and recordings w/o any cost. crazy egg seems to be the superior pick when u need more advanced features beyond the basics. it really depends on your budget
>clarity for free, crazy egg for power users
anyone else still paying for a premium tool or is clarity enough for most of you?

https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/crazy-egg-vs-microsoft-clarity/

6b76b No.1992

File: 1786066470223.jpg (82.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786066429900_1peh2r30.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

crazy egg is way too expensive for what it actually delivers compared to hotjar or even just using clarity w/ a custom event tracking setup.

6b76b No.1997

File: 1786167730130.jpg (104.64 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786167690734_ze1wjn5r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1991
clarity is fine for catching obvious bugs, but its basically useless for A/B testing workflows. if you arent running experiments via something like optimizely or vwo, the heatmaps wont tell you much about why users are dropping off. i still use posthog because having event-based tracking tied to the replays is a massive advantage for debugging conversion funnels.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">