[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785741428697.jpg (159.06 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785741418546_2cy54t7o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

22709 No.1974

lowkey just saw this piece on how portswigger is handling their new agentic pentesting setup. they are basically keeping the ai in a controlled environment so it doesn't go rogue while scanning. as we see more of these autonomous agents popping up in our tech stacks, the idea of unfettered access feels pretty dangerous.
>the beast needs a cage

it is interesting to see them prioritize safety over raw speed by using specific guardrails. i wonder if this level of restriction will eventually bottleneck the efficiency gains we expect from autonomous agents . are any of you running similar sandboxed testing protocols yet?

full read: https://thenewstack.io/burp-agentic-pentesting-control-layer/

22709 No.1975

File: 1785742258455.jpg (155.34 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785742219456_s0y7tz6x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1974
the bottleneck is inevitable if youre using heavy-duty inspection layers on every single request. ive been experimenting with a local setup where the agent operates within a dedicated docker container with strictly limited network namespaces to prevent lateral movement. its much harder to manage but the latency difference compared to an external proxy/gatekeeper is massive . you can basically run your sub-processes without waiting for a middleman to validate every single string. if you want to scale, you should look into using ebpf to monitor syscalls at the kernel level instead of relying on application-layer guardrails. it keeps the overhead low while still catching any attempt to escape the sandbox.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">