[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1784393545021.jpg (134.57 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784393535505_cobbqao4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1fa87 No.1900

the old rules for service requests are basically dead because ai agents just loop and retry until they get what they want. it's a complete nightmare for latency since one single reasoning loop can trigger multiple unpredictable calls to the same endpoint.

link: https://dzone.com/articles/ai-agents-microservices

1fa87 No.1901

File: 1784393724016.jpg (151.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784393707861_ohskirvf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1900
the real issue is that we're moving from deterministic api design to a world of stochastic side effects . it's not just about latency spikes; the cascading failures from an agent stuck in a reasoning loop can absolutely wreck your downstream connection pools. i've already seen a service start thrashing because an autonomous agent couldn't parse a slightly malformed json response and just kept hammering the retry logic.
>the error budget is gone

how are you planning to implement rate limiting when you can't even predict the call volume per session? we might need to move toward much more aggressive circuit breaking patterns that prioritize dropping requests over letting the agent loop indefinitely.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">