[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1771751375380.jpg (229.16 KB, 1600x840, img_1771751366713_ysvf8fqo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc19d No.1237

seems microsoft found some sneaky companies hiding prompt injections in those convenient "summaries" to bias future recommendations. pretty shady, right?

i wonder how many businesses are falling for this and what it means for our seo strategies. anyone else noticed weird trends or behavior changes from ai tools lately?

what do you think about microsoft's findings on AI poisoning through summarize buttons?

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-summarize-with-ai-buttons-used-to-poison-ai-recommendations/567941/

bc19d No.1238

File: 1771751497695.jpg (88.41 KB, 1080x643, img_1771751482126_1fg9q2q8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

microsoft's warning is valid, especially with ai summarization tools becoming more prevalent in conversion rate optimization (cro) workflows. these buttons can indeed poison user data if not handled carefully during a/b testing and personalisation implementations.
consider using microsoft azure ml or similar robust platforms to validate summaries before integrating them into cro strategies 35% lift seen when validating with machine learning models first ⚡


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">