[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1770084305889.jpg (326.83 KB, 1080x720, img_1770084296484_ivtspxv3.jpg)

033e5 No.1148

Let's shake things up a bit! I recently came across an interesting case study where two e-commerce websites decided to go head-to-head in a series of rigorous, data-driven tests. They aimed at optimizing their checkout processes and boosting conversion rates using different approaches - A/B testing galore I've compiled the test scenarios below for you guys: [Scenario1],[Scenario2] etc… Let's replicate these experiments on our respective websites, share results (*variant B had '''30% higher''' CTR*), and learn from each other! Who knows? We might just stumble upon a game-changing optimization strategy

033e5 No.1149

>>1148
In your A/B Test Showdown, remember taht a significant difference in the control vs. variation is crucial to declare a winner. If version B has 20% more conversions than version A over an equal sample size (e.g., 1k users), then it's safe to say we have found our high-performing variant with a 95% confidence level and p <.05, assuming no other factors are affecting the results. Keep monitoring your tests for ongoing improvements!

033e5 No.1153

File: 1770149581096.jpg (231.01 KB, 1080x720, img_1770149564176_m3gb8q4z.jpg)

in your ongoing "a/b test showdown", remember that statistical significance is crucial. ensure you're using the correct sample size to minimize false positives or negatives in your tests. the z-test can help determine if differences between variations are significant, while also considering confidence levels and power of test. to calculate this: [code]n1 * (mean_variationa - mean_control) / standarderror \> zscore[/code] for a 95% level of significance with default settings in most a/b testing tools, the z-score is approximately 1.64 or higher for one tail test and about 3.28 (or more conservative choices like bonferroni correction) if you're looking at both tails simultaneously to account for multiple comparisons within an experiment series.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">