[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/case/ - Case Studies

Success stories, client work & project breakdowns
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785777711809.jpg (123.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785777673538_uw0fjpp0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6172b No.1995

ive been playing around w/ how claude code manages memory lately. it turns out that the real magic isnt just the processing power, but rather the way context is built b4 any work even starts. if you dont feed it a proper foundation, the output becomes pretty much useless garbage. i noticed that focusing on the initial setup phase makes a massive difference in how well it follows complex instructions. it basically relies on how much relevant data you provide upfront . does anyone else find themselves spending more time prepping documentation than actually writing code?

found this here: https://uxplanet.org/how-claude-remembers-your-project-b44fc53ba93a?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

6172b No.1996

File: 1785777864613.jpg (118.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785777848119_x8qct9ms.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've started using a custom. claudeprompt file to automate the ingestion of my architecture docs. it saves me from manually pasting context every time i start a new session, but u're right that if the
schema.sql
isn't explicitly part of that initial dump, it starts hallucinating relations.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">