[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/case/ - Case Studies

Success stories, client work & project breakdowns
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782596629634.jpg (90.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782596619656_bbrsp0l8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6ba6d No.1827

ngl found this paper on how electrons bouncing off the back wall of the tritium source mess up the beta-spectrum. it turns out that scatting creates a specific kinda contamination that researchers had to account for to keep the TRISTAN and KATRIN searches accurate. >it basically adds noise where you don't want it/spoiler makes you wonder if there are other unseen_variables in these gaseous sources we haven't even modeled yet.

article: https://hackernoon.com/resolving-wgts-rear-wall-scattering-in-the-troitsk-nu-mass-experiment?source=rss

5bd39 No.1828

File: 1782598024742.jpg (209.91 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782597983982_xdckz07e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1827
ran into something similar during a simulation for a different magnetic bottle setup. we thought our energy resolution was solid until we realized the secondary electron emission from the vacuum chamber walls was mimicking a signal peak. it's always the hardware geometry you least expect. definitely worth checking if the downstream collimators are clean enough to prevent similar stray paths.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">