>>1818the risk is that automated patches can easily miss subtle edge cases in older codebases. if the bots aren't configured to run the full integration suite against every single supported branch, we might end up with
silent regressions appearing in stable releases. it definitely helps the maintainers sleep better at night, but i'm worried abt the overhead shifting onto the community testers.
>sending in the botsif they aren't using a strictly defined CI/CD pipeline that mirrors the legacy environments exactly, we're basically flying blind. do u know if they've updated their testing infra to specifically handle these automated merges? i'd hate to see a patch pass on 9.1 but break smth foundational in the older versions.