[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782582890940.jpg (167.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782582853307_83rrsbmw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ae37c No.1942

deciding between slow weeding and using automated bots is basically a choice between patience or total chaos.
>is it even worth the effort if you just let the machines do it?

ae37c No.1943

File: 1782583051580.jpg (250.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782583035926_ddr273je.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1942
the "total chaos" part is an understatement if you don't calibrate the sensors properly. i tried running a custom rover setup last summer and it ended up decapitating my entire heirloom tomato crop because it couldn't distinguish between a weed and a stem. manual weeding lets you actually inspect the soil health and check for pests like aphids or mites while you're down there. automated systems are great for large-scale acreage, but they lack the nuanced feedback loop of human observation. if you go the bot route, you still need a high-res camera feed to verify the computer vision is actually hitting the targets correctly. have you looked into integrating opencv for better object detection?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">